Analysis & Opinions - International Herald Tribune
U.S. and Russia: Agreeing not to disagree
We need to move past Cold War thinking and cooperate on missile defense.
According to media reports, the United States and Russia were close to signing an agreement on missile defense cooperation on the margins of the G-8 summit meeting in May. The details of the proposal are not public, but the disappointment over not achieving the agreement is.
It’s true that not since the failure at the Reykjavik summit 25 years ago to stem deployment of offensive nuclear missiles in Europe have Russia and the United States faced off on such a serious arms issue. But let’s get a grip. It’s not 1986, and America and Russia are not squared off in a nuclear stalemate. We’re discussing defensive missiles—not offensive ones. And we’re discussing cooperation—not confrontation. Or at least we could be.
The public is not privy to the details of the recently aborted agreement, but there’s so much confusion over terms like ‘‘joint’’ and ‘‘sectors’’ and misunderstanding of actual system capabilities that it’s a wonder we can even schedule a meeting in which to disagree. ...
See attached PDF for full op-ed.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Ryan, Kevin.“U.S. and Russia: Agreeing not to disagree.” International Herald Tribune, August 18, 2011.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
According to media reports, the United States and Russia were close to signing an agreement on missile defense cooperation on the margins of the G-8 summit meeting in May. The details of the proposal are not public, but the disappointment over not achieving the agreement is.
It’s true that not since the failure at the Reykjavik summit 25 years ago to stem deployment of offensive nuclear missiles in Europe have Russia and the United States faced off on such a serious arms issue. But let’s get a grip. It’s not 1986, and America and Russia are not squared off in a nuclear stalemate. We’re discussing defensive missiles—not offensive ones. And we’re discussing cooperation—not confrontation. Or at least we could be.
The public is not privy to the details of the recently aborted agreement, but there’s so much confusion over terms like ‘‘joint’’ and ‘‘sectors’’ and misunderstanding of actual system capabilities that it’s a wonder we can even schedule a meeting in which to disagree. ...
See attached PDF for full op-ed.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


