Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Allies, Airpower, and Modern Warfare: The Afghan Model in Afghanistan and Iraq
Abstract
The Afghan model of warfare uses indigenous allies to replace American conventional ground troops by exploiting U.S. airpower and small numbers of American special operations forces. Some argue that this model is widely applicable, enabling a major restructuring of the U.S. military and considerable freedom for American military intervention. An assessment of such claims in light of recent combat experience in Afghanistan and Iraq, however, finds the model’s applicability to be more limited. Where U.S. allies have had skills and motivation comparable to their enemies’, the Afghan model has proven extremely lethal even without U.S. conventional ground forces. But where U.S. allies have lacked these skills, they have proven unable to exploit the potential of American airpower. The model can thus be a powerful tool, but one with important preconditions for its use—and these preconditions limit its potential to transform U.S. force structure or defense policy.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Biddle, Stephen D.. “Allies, Airpower, and Modern Warfare: The Afghan Model in Afghanistan and Iraq.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 30. no. 3. (Winter 2005/06): 161-176 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Navigating China’s Opportunistic Approach to Overseas Naval Base Acquisition
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine’s Defense: A Whole-of-Society Effort Demanding Additional Support
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Bargaining with the Military: How Presidents Manage the Political Costs of Civilian Control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28
Abstract
The Afghan model of warfare uses indigenous allies to replace American conventional ground troops by exploiting U.S. airpower and small numbers of American special operations forces. Some argue that this model is widely applicable, enabling a major restructuring of the U.S. military and considerable freedom for American military intervention. An assessment of such claims in light of recent combat experience in Afghanistan and Iraq, however, finds the model’s applicability to be more limited. Where U.S. allies have had skills and motivation comparable to their enemies’, the Afghan model has proven extremely lethal even without U.S. conventional ground forces. But where U.S. allies have lacked these skills, they have proven unable to exploit the potential of American airpower. The model can thus be a powerful tool, but one with important preconditions for its use—and these preconditions limit its potential to transform U.S. force structure or defense policy.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Navigating China’s Opportunistic Approach to Overseas Naval Base Acquisition
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine’s Defense: A Whole-of-Society Effort Demanding Additional Support
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Bargaining with the Military: How Presidents Manage the Political Costs of Civilian Control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28