Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Bargaining with the Military: How Presidents Manage the Political Costs of Civilian Control
Summary
Presidents trying to avoid the political costs of exerting civilian control over the military have four potential approaches: defer to military officials on the broad strategic direction of a war; engage in horse-trading over troop deployments; sidestep leaders who disagree with civilian preferences in favor of alternative sources of advice; and stack the deck to ensure that the military provides recommendations civilian leaders want to hear. The Bush and Obama administrations’ decisions during the Iraq War illustrate these behaviors.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Andrew Payne, "Bargaining with the Military: How Presidents Manage the Political Costs of Civilian Control," International Security 48, no. 1 (Summer 2023), 166–207, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00468.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Navigating China’s Opportunistic Approach to Overseas Naval Base Acquisition
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine’s Defense: A Whole-of-Society Effort Demanding Additional Support
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine-NATO Primer: Membership Options Following the 2023 Annual Summit
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War
Summary
Presidents trying to avoid the political costs of exerting civilian control over the military have four potential approaches: defer to military officials on the broad strategic direction of a war; engage in horse-trading over troop deployments; sidestep leaders who disagree with civilian preferences in favor of alternative sources of advice; and stack the deck to ensure that the military provides recommendations civilian leaders want to hear. The Bush and Obama administrations’ decisions during the Iraq War illustrate these behaviors.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Andrew Payne, "Bargaining with the Military: How Presidents Manage the Political Costs of Civilian Control," International Security 48, no. 1 (Summer 2023), 166–207, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00468.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Navigating China’s Opportunistic Approach to Overseas Naval Base Acquisition
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine’s Defense: A Whole-of-Society Effort Demanding Additional Support
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ukraine-NATO Primer: Membership Options Following the 2023 Annual Summit
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Nonfatal Casualties and the Changing Costs of War