Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center
Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty: When is Good News Bad?
Abstract
Climate change is real and dangerous. Exactly how bad it will get, however, is uncertain. Uncertainty is particularly relevant for estimates of one of the key parameters: equilibrium climate sensitivity—how eventual temperatures will react as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations double. Despite significant advances in climate science and increased confidence in the accuracy of the range itself, the "likely" range has been 1.5–4.5°C for over three decades. In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) narrowed it to 2–4.5°C, only to reverse its decision in 2013, reinstating the prior range. In addition, the 2013 IPCC report removed prior mention of 3°C as the "best estimate." We interpret the implications of the 2013 IPCC decision to lower the bottom of the range and excise a best estimate. Intuitively, it might seem that a lower bottom would be good news. Here we ask: When might apparently good news about climate sensitivity in fact be bad news in the sense that it lowers societal wellbeing? The lowered bottom value also implies higher uncertainty about the temperature increase, a definite bad. Under reasonable assumptions, both the lowering of the lower bound and the removal of the "best estimate" may well be bad news.
Mark C. Freeman, Loughborough University
Gernot Wagner, Environmental Defense Fund
Richard Zeckhauser, Harvard University
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Freeman, Mark C., Gernot Wagner, and Richard Zeckhauser. “Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty: When is Good News Bad?.” Discussion Paper, 2015-76, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center, September 2015.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
The Politicization of Climate Policy: A Conversation with Kathleen Segerson
Policy Brief
- Harvard Initiative to Reduce Global Methane Emissions
Updating Estimates of Methane Emissions: The Case of China
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Book
- Simon & Schuster
SPIES: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
- The Role of Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Abstract
Climate change is real and dangerous. Exactly how bad it will get, however, is uncertain. Uncertainty is particularly relevant for estimates of one of the key parameters: equilibrium climate sensitivity—how eventual temperatures will react as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations double. Despite significant advances in climate science and increased confidence in the accuracy of the range itself, the "likely" range has been 1.5–4.5°C for over three decades. In 2007, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) narrowed it to 2–4.5°C, only to reverse its decision in 2013, reinstating the prior range. In addition, the 2013 IPCC report removed prior mention of 3°C as the "best estimate." We interpret the implications of the 2013 IPCC decision to lower the bottom of the range and excise a best estimate. Intuitively, it might seem that a lower bottom would be good news. Here we ask: When might apparently good news about climate sensitivity in fact be bad news in the sense that it lowers societal wellbeing? The lowered bottom value also implies higher uncertainty about the temperature increase, a definite bad. Under reasonable assumptions, both the lowering of the lower bound and the removal of the "best estimate" may well be bad news.
Mark C. Freeman, Loughborough University
Gernot Wagner, Environmental Defense Fund
Richard Zeckhauser, Harvard University
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
The Politicization of Climate Policy: A Conversation with Kathleen Segerson
Policy Brief - Harvard Initiative to Reduce Global Methane Emissions
Updating Estimates of Methane Emissions: The Case of China
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Book - Simon & Schuster
SPIES: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
-The Role of Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?