Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness
Summary
Contrary to the conventional wisdom, military innovation can degrade a state’s military effectiveness as well as strengthen it. This article probes the assumed relationship between innovation and improved effectiveness, concluding that the risk is not always worth taking. Specifically, innovation is most likely to hurt military effectiveness when a state is already overextended—when its commitments outstrip its resources. This commitment resource gap leads the state to cannibalize existing capabilities without clear evidence of effective new ones.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Kendrick Kuo, "Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness," International Security, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Fall 2022), pp. 48–87, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00446.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Iran and Israel's Dangerous Gambit
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Summary
Contrary to the conventional wisdom, military innovation can degrade a state’s military effectiveness as well as strengthen it. This article probes the assumed relationship between innovation and improved effectiveness, concluding that the risk is not always worth taking. Specifically, innovation is most likely to hurt military effectiveness when a state is already overextended—when its commitments outstrip its resources. This commitment resource gap leads the state to cannibalize existing capabilities without clear evidence of effective new ones.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Kendrick Kuo, "Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness," International Security, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Fall 2022), pp. 48–87, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00446.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Iran and Israel's Dangerous Gambit
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?