Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness
Summary
Contrary to the conventional wisdom, military innovation can degrade a state’s military effectiveness as well as strengthen it. This article probes the assumed relationship between innovation and improved effectiveness, concluding that the risk is not always worth taking. Specifically, innovation is most likely to hurt military effectiveness when a state is already overextended—when its commitments outstrip its resources. This commitment resource gap leads the state to cannibalize existing capabilities without clear evidence of effective new ones.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Kendrick Kuo, "Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness," International Security, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Fall 2022), pp. 48–87, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00446.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Japan's Strategic Imperative
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Cult of the Persuasive: Why U.S. Security Assistance Fails
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Affairs
Guardians of the Republic
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
HKS Arctic Initiative Response: Priorities for Norway’s Chairship of the Arctic Council
Paper
India's Foreign Policy
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Summary
Contrary to the conventional wisdom, military innovation can degrade a state’s military effectiveness as well as strengthen it. This article probes the assumed relationship between innovation and improved effectiveness, concluding that the risk is not always worth taking. Specifically, innovation is most likely to hurt military effectiveness when a state is already overextended—when its commitments outstrip its resources. This commitment resource gap leads the state to cannibalize existing capabilities without clear evidence of effective new ones.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Kendrick Kuo, "Dangerous Changes: When Military Innovation Harms Combat Effectiveness," International Security, Vol. 47, No. 2 (Fall 2022), pp. 48–87, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00446.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Japan's Strategic Imperative
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Cult of the Persuasive: Why U.S. Security Assistance Fails
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Affairs
Guardians of the Republic
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
HKS Arctic Initiative Response: Priorities for Norway’s Chairship of the Arctic Council
Paper
India's Foreign Policy
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?