Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
The Future of U.S. Carbon-Pricing Policy
Abstract
There is widespread agreement among economists — and a diverse set of other policy analysts — that at least in the long run, an economy-wide carbon pricing system will be an essential element of any national policy that can achieve meaningful reductions of CO2 emissions cost-effectively in the United States. There is less agreement, however, among economists and others in the policy community regarding the choice of specific carbon-pricing policy instrument, with some supporting carbon taxes and others favoring cap-and-trade mechanisms. This prompts two important questions. Which — if either — of the two major approaches to carbon pricing is superior in terms of relevant criteria, including but not limited to efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and distributional equity? And which of the two approaches is more likely to be adopted in the future in the United States? This paper addresses these questions by drawing on both normative and positive theories of policy instrument choice as they apply to U.S. climate change policy, and draws extensively on relevant empirical evidence. The paper concludes with a look at the path ahead, including an assessment of how the two carbon-pricing instruments can be made more politically acceptable.
Robert Stavins
Harvard University
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Stavins, Robert. “The Future of U.S. Carbon-Pricing Policy.” Discussion Paper, 2019-95, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, May 2019.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Discussion Paper
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Transitioning to Long-Run Effective and Efficient Climate Policies
Discussion Paper
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
GHG Cap-and-Trade: Implications for Effective and Efficient Climate Policy in Oregon
Discussion Paper
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Key Issues Facing California's GHG Cap-and-Trade System for 2021–2030
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Arctic Climate Science: A Way Forward for Cooperation through the Arctic Council and Beyond
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Abstract
There is widespread agreement among economists — and a diverse set of other policy analysts — that at least in the long run, an economy-wide carbon pricing system will be an essential element of any national policy that can achieve meaningful reductions of CO2 emissions cost-effectively in the United States. There is less agreement, however, among economists and others in the policy community regarding the choice of specific carbon-pricing policy instrument, with some supporting carbon taxes and others favoring cap-and-trade mechanisms. This prompts two important questions. Which — if either — of the two major approaches to carbon pricing is superior in terms of relevant criteria, including but not limited to efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and distributional equity? And which of the two approaches is more likely to be adopted in the future in the United States? This paper addresses these questions by drawing on both normative and positive theories of policy instrument choice as they apply to U.S. climate change policy, and draws extensively on relevant empirical evidence. The paper concludes with a look at the path ahead, including an assessment of how the two carbon-pricing instruments can be made more politically acceptable.
Robert Stavins
Harvard University
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Transitioning to Long-Run Effective and Efficient Climate Policies
Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
GHG Cap-and-Trade: Implications for Effective and Efficient Climate Policy in Oregon
Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Key Issues Facing California's GHG Cap-and-Trade System for 2021–2030
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Arctic Climate Science: A Way Forward for Cooperation through the Arctic Council and Beyond
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It