Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Homosexuals in the U.S. Military: Open Integration and Combat Effectiveness
Abstract
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue”--the policy that allows homosexual men and women to serve in the U.S. military as long as they keep their sexual orientation private— has stirred controversy since it was implemented in the summer of 1993. As Elizabeth Kier of the University of California at Berkeley argues, both opponents and proponents of the integration of gays and lesbians into the armed forces agree that this policy is unsatisfactory, but for different reasons. Kier focuses on the opponents of open integration, who charge that permitting homosexuals to serve openly would harm military effectiveness by hindering the development of “primary unit cohesion,” which they contend is a key ingredient to performance. Kier challenges this assumption head-on and explains why permitting gays and lesbians to serve openly would actually enhance military performance.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Elizabeth Kier. “Homosexuals in the U.S. Military: Open Integration and Combat Effectiveness.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 23. no. 2. (Fall 1998): 5-39 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Japan's Strategic Imperative
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Cult of the Persuasive: Why U.S. Security Assistance Fails
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Affairs
Guardians of the Republic
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper
India's Foreign Policy
Analysis & Opinions
- The Hill
We Must Sustain America’s Big Tech Engines of Innovation
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Some Rules of Global Politics Matter More Than Others
Abstract
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t Pursue”--the policy that allows homosexual men and women to serve in the U.S. military as long as they keep their sexual orientation private— has stirred controversy since it was implemented in the summer of 1993. As Elizabeth Kier of the University of California at Berkeley argues, both opponents and proponents of the integration of gays and lesbians into the armed forces agree that this policy is unsatisfactory, but for different reasons. Kier focuses on the opponents of open integration, who charge that permitting homosexuals to serve openly would harm military effectiveness by hindering the development of “primary unit cohesion,” which they contend is a key ingredient to performance. Kier challenges this assumption head-on and explains why permitting gays and lesbians to serve openly would actually enhance military performance.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Japan's Strategic Imperative
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Cult of the Persuasive: Why U.S. Security Assistance Fails
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Affairs
Guardians of the Republic
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Paper
India's Foreign Policy
Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
We Must Sustain America’s Big Tech Engines of Innovation
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Some Rules of Global Politics Matter More Than Others