Journal Article - Journal of Conflict Resolution
Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations
Abstract
In this article, the authors investigate the relationship between states' political leaders' ages, their regime type, and the likelihood of militarized dispute initiation and escalation. They examine more than 100,000 interstate dyads between 1875 and 2002 to systematically test the relationship between leader age and militarized disputes. The results show that, in general, as the age of leaders increases, they become more likely to both initiate and escalate militarized disputes. In addition, the interaction of age and regime type is significant. In personalist regimes, the general effect reverses; as age increases, the relative risk of conflict declines in comparison to other types of regimes. Increasing leader age in democracies increases the relative risk propensity for conflict initiation at a higher level than for personalist regimes, while the impact of increasing leader age is most substantial in intermediate regimes.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Horowitz, Michael, Rose McDermott, and Allan C. Stam. “Leader Age, Regime Type, and Violent International Relations.” Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 49. no. 5. (October 2005): 661-685 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Theory
Conceptualizing Interstate Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions
- The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
Analysis & Opinions
- The Straits Times
US-China ties: Averting the grandest collision of all
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Military Rivalry: China vs the U.S.
Abstract
In this article, the authors investigate the relationship between states' political leaders' ages, their regime type, and the likelihood of militarized dispute initiation and escalation. They examine more than 100,000 interstate dyads between 1875 and 2002 to systematically test the relationship between leader age and militarized disputes. The results show that, in general, as the age of leaders increases, they become more likely to both initiate and escalate militarized disputes. In addition, the interaction of age and regime type is significant. In personalist regimes, the general effect reverses; as age increases, the relative risk of conflict declines in comparison to other types of regimes. Increasing leader age in democracies increases the relative risk propensity for conflict initiation at a higher level than for personalist regimes, while the impact of increasing leader age is most substantial in intermediate regimes.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Theory
Conceptualizing Interstate Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions - The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
Analysis & Opinions - The Straits Times
US-China ties: Averting the grandest collision of all
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Military Rivalry: China vs the U.S.