Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Myth of Air Power in the Persian Gulf War and the Future of Warfare
Abstract
The coalition victory over Iraq in the 1991 Persian Gulf War was a historic rout. According to the conventional wisdom, the use of air power—primarily by the United States—assured the coalition's unparalleled success. Daryl Press of Dartmouth College takes a different view. Using detailed evidence from the four-day ground campaign, Press concludes that air power was "neither sufficient nor necessary" in defeating Iraq and that "its role has been exaggerated and misunderstood." Press argues that other factors, including the overwhelming superiority of U.S. and British ground troops in both training and equipment and Iraq's poor timing of the invasion of Kuwait, better explain the lopsided outcome.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Press, Daryl G.. “The Myth of Air Power in the Persian Gulf War and the Future of Warfare.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 26. no. 2. (Fall 2001): 5-44 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report
- Intelligence Project
Report: Marking the CIA’s 75th Anniversary: Reflections on the Past, Visions of the Future
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Strategic Substitution: China’s Search for Coercive Leverage in the Information Age
Magazine Article
- Arms Control Today
Negative Security Assurances After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Abstract
The coalition victory over Iraq in the 1991 Persian Gulf War was a historic rout. According to the conventional wisdom, the use of air power—primarily by the United States—assured the coalition's unparalleled success. Daryl Press of Dartmouth College takes a different view. Using detailed evidence from the four-day ground campaign, Press concludes that air power was "neither sufficient nor necessary" in defeating Iraq and that "its role has been exaggerated and misunderstood." Press argues that other factors, including the overwhelming superiority of U.S. and British ground troops in both training and equipment and Iraq's poor timing of the invasion of Kuwait, better explain the lopsided outcome.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Report - Intelligence Project
Report: Marking the CIA’s 75th Anniversary: Reflections on the Past, Visions of the Future
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Strategic Substitution: China’s Search for Coercive Leverage in the Information Age
Magazine Article - Arms Control Today
Negative Security Assurances After Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?