Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Norms and Security: The Case of International Assassination
Abstract
Ward Thomas of the College of the Holy Cross traces the evolution of the norm against international assassination from Roman times to the present, seeking answers to three questions: Where did the norm come from? How much does it influence state actions? And why does it seem to prevail over other ethical injunctions, such as the principle of proportionality in warfare? Thomas maintains that, historically, great powers have prohibited political assassination because it reinforces their position vis-à-vis other state and nonstate actors and legitimizes acceptable forms of violence such as large-scale intervention and war. Thomas then explores the likelihood that the norm against assassination may be in decline given recent structural changes to the international political system, including an increase in nontraditional modes of violence such as terrorism and guerrilla warfare.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Thomas, Ward. “Norms and Security: The Case of International Assassination.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 25. no. 1. (Summer 2000): 105-133 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Is a Root Cause of Israel and Palestine's Latest War
Analysis & Opinions
- Harvard Crimson
Five Harvard Experts Weigh in on War in Israel and Gaza
Broadcast Appearance
- Aljazeera
Stephen Walt: US, Israeli Strategy on Palestine has Failed
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Impact of Henry Kissinger
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Abstract
Ward Thomas of the College of the Holy Cross traces the evolution of the norm against international assassination from Roman times to the present, seeking answers to three questions: Where did the norm come from? How much does it influence state actions? And why does it seem to prevail over other ethical injunctions, such as the principle of proportionality in warfare? Thomas maintains that, historically, great powers have prohibited political assassination because it reinforces their position vis-à-vis other state and nonstate actors and legitimizes acceptable forms of violence such as large-scale intervention and war. Thomas then explores the likelihood that the norm against assassination may be in decline given recent structural changes to the international political system, including an increase in nontraditional modes of violence such as terrorism and guerrilla warfare.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Is a Root Cause of Israel and Palestine's Latest War
Analysis & Opinions - Harvard Crimson
Five Harvard Experts Weigh in on War in Israel and Gaza
Broadcast Appearance - Aljazeera
Stephen Walt: US, Israeli Strategy on Palestine has Failed
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
AI and Trust
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Impact of Henry Kissinger
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War