Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Right to Be Right: Civil-Military Relations and the Iraq Surge Decision
Summary
President George W. Bush’s Iraq surge decision in late 2006 is an interesting case for civil-military relations theory, in particular, the debate between professional supremacists and civilian supremacists over how much to defer to the military on decisions during war. The professional supremacists argue that the primary problem for civil-military relations during war is ensuring the military an adequate voice and keeping civilians from micromanaging and mismanaging matters. Civilian supremacists, in contrast, argue that the primary problem is ensuring that well-informed civilian strategic guidance is authoritatively directing key decisions, even when the military disagrees with that direction. A close reading of the available evidence—both in published accounts and in new, not-for-attribution interviews with the key players—shows that the surge decision vindicates neither camp. If President Bush had followed the professional supremacists, there would have been no surge because his key military commanders were recommending against that option. If Bush had followed the civilian supremacists to the letter, however, there might have been a revolt of the generals, causing the domestic political props under the surge to collapse. Instead, Bush’s hybrid approach worked better than either ideal type would have.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Feaver, Peter D.. “The Right to Be Right: Civil-Military Relations and the Iraq Surge Decision.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 35. no. 4. (Spring 2011): 87-125 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Is America Reverting to Isolationism?
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Some Rules of Global Politics Matter More Than Others
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Is Too Scared of the Multipolar World
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Summary
President George W. Bush’s Iraq surge decision in late 2006 is an interesting case for civil-military relations theory, in particular, the debate between professional supremacists and civilian supremacists over how much to defer to the military on decisions during war. The professional supremacists argue that the primary problem for civil-military relations during war is ensuring the military an adequate voice and keeping civilians from micromanaging and mismanaging matters. Civilian supremacists, in contrast, argue that the primary problem is ensuring that well-informed civilian strategic guidance is authoritatively directing key decisions, even when the military disagrees with that direction. A close reading of the available evidence—both in published accounts and in new, not-for-attribution interviews with the key players—shows that the surge decision vindicates neither camp. If President Bush had followed the professional supremacists, there would have been no surge because his key military commanders were recommending against that option. If Bush had followed the civilian supremacists to the letter, however, there might have been a revolt of the generals, causing the domestic political props under the surge to collapse. Instead, Bush’s hybrid approach worked better than either ideal type would have.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Is America Reverting to Isolationism?
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Some Rules of Global Politics Matter More Than Others
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Is Too Scared of the Multipolar World
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It