Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Rule of Law and the Role of Strategy in U.S. Nuclear Doctrine
Summary
When properly applied, the key principles of the law of armed conflict—distinction, proportionality, and precaution—have a profound impact on U.S. nuclear doctrine. Specifically, some, but by no means all, potential nuclear counterforce attacks against legitimate military targets are legal. Any countervalue attack against enemy civilians, however, would be illegal, even in reprisal for a strike against U.S. or allied civilians—contrary to what is implied in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Scott D. Sagan and Allen S. Weiner, "The Rule of Law and the Role of Strategy in U.S. Nuclear Doctrine," International Security, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Spring 2021), pp. 126–166, doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00407.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War: Nuclear Weapons Still Matter
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Nuclear Balance Is What States Make of It
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Defending the United States: Revisiting National Missile Defense against North Korea
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
How ChatGPT Hijacks Democracy
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat
Summary
When properly applied, the key principles of the law of armed conflict—distinction, proportionality, and precaution—have a profound impact on U.S. nuclear doctrine. Specifically, some, but by no means all, potential nuclear counterforce attacks against legitimate military targets are legal. Any countervalue attack against enemy civilians, however, would be illegal, even in reprisal for a strike against U.S. or allied civilians—contrary to what is implied in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Lessons for the Next War: Nuclear Weapons Still Matter
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Nuclear Balance Is What States Make of It
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Defending the United States: Revisiting National Missile Defense against North Korea
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
How ChatGPT Hijacks Democracy
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat