Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Same As It Ever Was: Nuclear Alarmism, Proliferation, and the Cold War
Summary
A widely held and largely unchallenged view among many scholars and policymakers is that nuclear proliferation is the gravest threat facing the United States today, that it is more dangerous than ever, and that few meaningful lessons can be drawn from the nuclear history of a supposed simpler and more predictable period, the Cold War. This view, labeled "nuclear alarmism," is based on four myths about the history of the nuclear age. First, today's nuclear threats are new and more dangerous than those of the past. Second, unlike today, nuclear weapons stabilized international politics during the Cold War, when in fact the record was mixed. The third myth conflates the history of the nuclear arms race with the geopolitical and ideological competition between the Soviet Union and the United States, creating an oversimplified and misguided portrayal of the Cold War. The final myth is that the Cold War bipolar military rivalry was the only force driving nuclear proliferation. A better understanding of this history, and, in particular, of how and why the international community escaped calamity during a far more dangerous time against ruthless and powerful adversaries, can produce more effective U.S. policies than those proposed by the nuclear alarmists.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Francis J. Gavin. “Same As It Ever Was: Nuclear Alarmism, Proliferation, and the Cold War.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 34. no. 3. (Winter 2009/10): 7-37 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
The Dueling Nuclear Nightmares Behind the South Korean President’s Alarming Comments
Analysis & Opinions
- Arms Control Today
The Cuban Missile Crisis at 60: Six Timeless Lessons for Arms Control
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Affairs
Was Ukraine Wrong to Give Up Its Nukes?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Is Too Scared of the Multipolar World
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The UN High Seas Treaty in the Arctic Context
Summary
A widely held and largely unchallenged view among many scholars and policymakers is that nuclear proliferation is the gravest threat facing the United States today, that it is more dangerous than ever, and that few meaningful lessons can be drawn from the nuclear history of a supposed simpler and more predictable period, the Cold War. This view, labeled "nuclear alarmism," is based on four myths about the history of the nuclear age. First, today's nuclear threats are new and more dangerous than those of the past. Second, unlike today, nuclear weapons stabilized international politics during the Cold War, when in fact the record was mixed. The third myth conflates the history of the nuclear arms race with the geopolitical and ideological competition between the Soviet Union and the United States, creating an oversimplified and misguided portrayal of the Cold War. The final myth is that the Cold War bipolar military rivalry was the only force driving nuclear proliferation. A better understanding of this history, and, in particular, of how and why the international community escaped calamity during a far more dangerous time against ruthless and powerful adversaries, can produce more effective U.S. policies than those proposed by the nuclear alarmists.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
The Dueling Nuclear Nightmares Behind the South Korean President’s Alarming Comments
Analysis & Opinions - Arms Control Today
The Cuban Missile Crisis at 60: Six Timeless Lessons for Arms Control
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Affairs
Was Ukraine Wrong to Give Up Its Nukes?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Is Too Scared of the Multipolar World
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The UN High Seas Treaty in the Arctic Context