Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
What’s in a Line? Is Partition a Solution to Civil War?
Does territorial partition of countries in civil wars help to end these wars, reducing the risk of recurrence? Researchers have proposed territorial partition with or without formal recognition of sovereignty as a solution to civil wars and a way to create self-enforcing peace. Quantitative studies of the effect of partition on the risk of renewed civil war, however, suffer several main shortcomings, including conflicting results in the extant literature that result mainly from data coding differences, selective use of case histories, and methodological problems. A new data set and a benchmark empirical analysis find that, on average, partition is unlikely to reduce the risk of a return to civil war and, in some cases, may increase that risk.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Nicholas Sambanis and Jonah Schulhofer-Wohl. “What’s in a Line? Is Partition a Solution to Civil War?.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 34. no. 2. (Fall 2009): 82-118 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Elites Are Getting Nationalism All Wrong
Book
- Princeton University Press
The Jewish World of Alexander Hamilton
Analysis & Opinions
- World Politics Review
How to Help Myanmar Before It’s Too Late
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Does territorial partition of countries in civil wars help to end these wars, reducing the risk of recurrence? Researchers have proposed territorial partition with or without formal recognition of sovereignty as a solution to civil wars and a way to create self-enforcing peace. Quantitative studies of the effect of partition on the risk of renewed civil war, however, suffer several main shortcomings, including conflicting results in the extant literature that result mainly from data coding differences, selective use of case histories, and methodological problems. A new data set and a benchmark empirical analysis find that, on average, partition is unlikely to reduce the risk of a return to civil war and, in some cases, may increase that risk.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Elites Are Getting Nationalism All Wrong
Book - Princeton University Press
The Jewish World of Alexander Hamilton
Analysis & Opinions - World Politics Review
How to Help Myanmar Before It’s Too Late
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Ideal Qualities of a Successful Diplomat
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War