Journal Article - Perceptions
Wherein the Divide? Terrorism and the Future of Atlanticism
Abstract
This article argues that the tactical and strategic divergence in the approach to counterterrorism across the Atlantic is best understood through the prism of strategic culture. The different experiences with international terrorism have contributed to vastly different perceptions of the terrorist threat and in turn to different counterterrorism approaches. The paper introduces the concept of strategic culture, outlines the two continents' experience with terrorism and explains why the end of the Cold War brought new tensions to the fore. It suggests that a strategic culture analysis of the divergent approaches to terrorism will help inform and enrich the ubiquitous one-dimensional realist rendering of the Atlantic divide and demonstrate that under the right conditions, international terrorism, rather than leading to permanent divorce might paradoxically be the very thing that transforms the Atlantic relationship back towards a consolidated Atlantic community.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Chorev, Matan. “Wherein the Divide? Terrorism and the Future of Atlanticism.” Perceptions, vol. XI. (Spring 2006): 33-48 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Policy Brief
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Nuclear Terrorism Fact Sheet
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Abstract
This article argues that the tactical and strategic divergence in the approach to counterterrorism across the Atlantic is best understood through the prism of strategic culture. The different experiences with international terrorism have contributed to vastly different perceptions of the terrorist threat and in turn to different counterterrorism approaches. The paper introduces the concept of strategic culture, outlines the two continents' experience with terrorism and explains why the end of the Cold War brought new tensions to the fore. It suggests that a strategic culture analysis of the divergent approaches to terrorism will help inform and enrich the ubiquitous one-dimensional realist rendering of the Atlantic divide and demonstrate that under the right conditions, international terrorism, rather than leading to permanent divorce might paradoxically be the very thing that transforms the Atlantic relationship back towards a consolidated Atlantic community.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
America Fueled the Fire in the Middle East
Policy Brief - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Nuclear Terrorism Fact Sheet
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Enormous Risks and Uncertain Benefits of an Israeli Strike Against Iran's Nuclear Facilities