Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security

Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy

| Spring 2001

Abstract

Supporters of NATO enlargement contend that it will promote the spread of democracy, which in turn will lead to greater stability in Europe. Dan Reiter of Emory University disagrees. Reiter maintains that historical record—during and after the Cold War—fails to establish any correlation between NATO membership and the expansion of democracy. He also suggests that the costs and risks of NATO enlargement greatly exceed the potential benefits. Adding new members will only exacerbate tensions with Russia and diminish the likelihood of cooperation on a host of pressing security issues, including arms control and peacekeeping.

Want to Read More?

The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
Read Full Article
For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Dan Reiter. “Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 25. no. 4. (Spring 2001):
41-67
.

The Author

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
In an interview, John P. Holdren says the climate deal is not an ideal piece of legislation,“but it is so much more than we thought we were going to get.”
Watch Mariana Budjeryn on France24 discussing the dangers of shelling near Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest in Europe.
Alina Polyakova and Ilya Timtchenko argue that to win the war of attrition with Russia, Ukraine will need more heavy weapons from more European allies.
Most Viewed

Tags