Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Why Terrorism Does Not Work
Summary
This is the first article to analyze a large sample of terrorist groups in terms of their policy effectiveness. It includes every foreign terrorist organization (FTO) designated by the U.S. Department of State since 2001. The key variable for FTO success is a tactical one: target selection. Terrorist groups whose attacks on civilian targets outnumber attacks on military targets do not tend to achieve their policy objectives, regardless of their nature. Contrary to the prevailing view that terrorism is an effective means of political coercion, the universe of cases suggests that, first, contemporary terrorist groups rarely achieve their policy objectives and, second, the poor success rate is inherent to the tactic of terrorism itself. The bulk of the article develops a theory for why countries are reluctant to make policy concessions when their civilian populations are the primary target.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Abrahms, Max. “Why Terrorism Does Not Work.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 31. no. 2. (Fall 2006): 42-78 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Women in Public Policy Program, Harvard Kennedy School
- Belfer Center's Korea Project Co-Leads Planning for South Korean President's Historic Harvard Visit and Speech
Analysis & Opinions
- International Affairs Blog
Nuclear Policy at the G7: Six Key Questions
Journal Article
- Security Studies
Madman or Mad Genius? The International Benefits and Domestic Costs of the Madman Strategy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
If Trump Returns
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison
Summary
This is the first article to analyze a large sample of terrorist groups in terms of their policy effectiveness. It includes every foreign terrorist organization (FTO) designated by the U.S. Department of State since 2001. The key variable for FTO success is a tactical one: target selection. Terrorist groups whose attacks on civilian targets outnumber attacks on military targets do not tend to achieve their policy objectives, regardless of their nature. Contrary to the prevailing view that terrorism is an effective means of political coercion, the universe of cases suggests that, first, contemporary terrorist groups rarely achieve their policy objectives and, second, the poor success rate is inherent to the tactic of terrorism itself. The bulk of the article develops a theory for why countries are reluctant to make policy concessions when their civilian populations are the primary target.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Women in Public Policy Program, Harvard Kennedy School
-Belfer Center's Korea Project Co-Leads Planning for South Korean President's Historic Harvard Visit and Speech
Analysis & Opinions - International Affairs Blog
Nuclear Policy at the G7: Six Key Questions
Journal Article - Security Studies
Madman or Mad Genius? The International Benefits and Domestic Costs of the Madman Strategy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
If Trump Returns
Analysis & Opinions
US-China Relations: An Interview with Graham Allison