Paper - Institute of Nuclear Materials Management
Addressing Military Nuclear Materials Beyond the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit
Non-civilian or military nuclear materials comprise the vast majority of the world’s nuclear material stocks – yet they remain outside the scope of much of the existing global nuclear security architecture. Policymakers will need to consider ways to address this “military materials gap” by advancing new mechanisms and strategies in order to develop and sustain a comprehensive global nuclear security architecture. Particular attention should be placed on developing confidence building measures and other transparency tools to build international assurance in the security of military materials. This paper will discuss the various strategies for addressing military materials security and propose recommendations for how the international community can address the concept of comprehensiveness in the global nuclear security architecture going forward.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Ratz, Leon and Nickolas Roth, “Addressing Military Nuclear Materials Beyond the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit,” Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, July 2016.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Hill
Hiroshima 75 Years Later: The Fallout Continues
Analysis & Opinions
- At the Brink
At the Brink: Loose Nukes
Paper
- Institute for Nuclear Materials Management
IAEA Nuclear Security Recommendations (INFCIRC/225): The Next Generation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Non-civilian or military nuclear materials comprise the vast majority of the world’s nuclear material stocks – yet they remain outside the scope of much of the existing global nuclear security architecture. Policymakers will need to consider ways to address this “military materials gap” by advancing new mechanisms and strategies in order to develop and sustain a comprehensive global nuclear security architecture. Particular attention should be placed on developing confidence building measures and other transparency tools to build international assurance in the security of military materials. This paper will discuss the various strategies for addressing military materials security and propose recommendations for how the international community can address the concept of comprehensiveness in the global nuclear security architecture going forward.
Ratz, Leon and Nickolas Roth, “Addressing Military Nuclear Materials Beyond the 2016 Nuclear Security Summit,” Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, July 2016.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
Hiroshima 75 Years Later: The Fallout Continues
Analysis & Opinions - At the Brink
At the Brink: Loose Nukes
Paper - Institute for Nuclear Materials Management
IAEA Nuclear Security Recommendations (INFCIRC/225): The Next Generation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


