Journal Article - Nevada Law Journal
Barriers to Progress at the Negotiation Table: Internal Conflicts among Israelis and among Palestinians
A profound paradox characterizes the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: While the outline of a two-state solution that would better serve the interests of most Israelis and most Palestinians is reasonably clear, leaders of both parties are unable to reach agreement across the negotiation table this seemingly intractable, often violent, conflict persists. Indeed, during the five years since the collapse of the Oslo peace process, more than 1000 Israelis and 3000 Palestinians have died in renewed violence. We believe the essential explanation for this paradox relates to profound internal conflicts among Israeli Jews on the one hand, and among Palestinians on the other. These "behind the table" conflicts within each community stand as barriers to progress at the negotiation table.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Mnookin, Robert H., Ehud Eiran, and Sreemati Mitter. “Barriers to Progress at the Negotiation Table: Internal Conflicts among Israelis and among Palestinians.” Nevada Law Journal, vol. 6. (Winter 2006): 299-366 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear Program: Separating Real Concerns from Threat Inflation
Analysis & Opinions
- CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: Israel Signs Diplomatic Deals with UAE, Bahrain
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Sadat and the Road to Jerusalem: Bold Gestures and Risk Acceptance in the Search for Peace
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
A profound paradox characterizes the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: While the outline of a two-state solution that would better serve the interests of most Israelis and most Palestinians is reasonably clear, leaders of both parties are unable to reach agreement across the negotiation table this seemingly intractable, often violent, conflict persists. Indeed, during the five years since the collapse of the Oslo peace process, more than 1000 Israelis and 3000 Palestinians have died in renewed violence. We believe the essential explanation for this paradox relates to profound internal conflicts among Israeli Jews on the one hand, and among Palestinians on the other. These "behind the table" conflicts within each community stand as barriers to progress at the negotiation table.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear Program: Separating Real Concerns from Threat Inflation
Analysis & Opinions - CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: Israel Signs Diplomatic Deals with UAE, Bahrain
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Sadat and the Road to Jerusalem: Bold Gestures and Risk Acceptance in the Search for Peace
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership


