Journal Article - Washington Quarterly
The Sum of all Fears: Israel’s Perception of a Nuclear-Armed Iran
President Rouhani's initiative to restart nuclear negotiations has been met with deep skepticism in Israel. Haifa University political scientist Ehud Eiran and MTA Executive Director Martin Malin suggest in the current issue of The Washington Quarterly that Israel's framing of, and response to, the Iranian nuclear program is a product of four distinct fears: existential threat, strategic risk, socio-economic erosion, and a challenge to founding principles. Understanding the sources and consequences of these fears can help policy makers avoid dangerous pitfalls and missed opportunities in their response to the current Iranian initiative.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Eiran, Ehud and Malin, Martin B.. “The Sum of all Fears: Israel’s Perception of a Nuclear-Armed Iran.” Washington Quarterly, vol. 3. no. 36. (Summer 2013): 77-89 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Death Dust: The Little-Known Story of U.S. and Soviet Pursuit of Radiological Weapons
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
Analysis & Opinions
- The Conversation
Lesson one for Rick Perry: The Energy Department doesn’t produce much energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Iran Nuclear Archive: Impressions and Implications
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
President Rouhani's initiative to restart nuclear negotiations has been met with deep skepticism in Israel. Haifa University political scientist Ehud Eiran and MTA Executive Director Martin Malin suggest in the current issue of The Washington Quarterly that Israel's framing of, and response to, the Iranian nuclear program is a product of four distinct fears: existential threat, strategic risk, socio-economic erosion, and a challenge to founding principles. Understanding the sources and consequences of these fears can help policy makers avoid dangerous pitfalls and missed opportunities in their response to the current Iranian initiative.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Death Dust: The Little-Known Story of U.S. and Soviet Pursuit of Radiological Weapons
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
Analysis & Opinions - The Conversation
Lesson one for Rick Perry: The Energy Department doesn’t produce much energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Iran Nuclear Archive: Impressions and Implications
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy