Journal Article - CTC Sentinel
Building a Strategic U.S.- Pakistan Nuclear Relationship
On April 12-13, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama hosted the Washington Nuclear Security Summit. The final communiqué released from the summit, and agreed to by the 47 countries in attendance, stated that "nuclear terrorism is one of the most challenging threats to international security, and strong nuclear security measures are the most effective means to prevent terrorists, criminals, or other unauthorized actors from acquiring nuclear materials." With this commitment, the bar has been raised for all countries to reassess their current levels of engagement with one another in an effort to achieve a greater level of nuclear security. As President Obama stated in Prague on April 5, 2009, "one nuclear weapon exploded in one city- be it New York or Moscow, Islamabad, or Mumbai, Tokyo or Tel Aviv, Paris or Prague-could kill hundreds of thousands of people. And no matter where it happens, there is no end to what the consequences might be-for our global safety, our security, our society, our economy, to our ultimate survival."
The United States and Pakistan recently initiated a promising series of high level talks to develop a strategic relationship between the two countries. Even in pursuit of such an expanded bilateral agenda, however, lowering the risks associated with Pakistan's nuclear weapons must stand at the top of the list of priorities. Indeed, a key test of whether the two countries are able to develop a genuine partnership is whether the current levels of extreme sensitivity and mutual mistrust can be reduced, if not eliminated. In turn, this might lead to a shared sense of purpose that the proliferation and terrorism risks associated with nuclear weapons can be mitigated in ways that are less opaque, yet fully respectful of Pakistan's sovereignty.
In this spirit, the nuclear-related agenda for joint cooperation should concentrate on four strategic areas of engagement: understanding the risks associated with Pakistan's nuclear weapons program; considering broader trends that could impact Pakistan's nuclear security posture negatively; strengthening communications in case of a nuclear crisis; and increasing public outreach in Pakistan that counters the mysteries surrounding cooperation in this area of great national sensitivity.
To continue reading the paper, download the PDF below:
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Mowatt-Larssen, Rolf. “Building a Strategic U.S.- Pakistan Nuclear Relationship.” CTC Sentinel, vol. 3. no. 4. (April 21, 2010) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Diplomat
Shifting Nuclear Sands in South Asia: Understanding India’s Counterforce Temptations
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
India’s Counterforce Temptations: Strategic Dilemmas, Doctrine, and Capabilities
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
On April 12-13, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama hosted the Washington Nuclear Security Summit. The final communiqué released from the summit, and agreed to by the 47 countries in attendance, stated that "nuclear terrorism is one of the most challenging threats to international security, and strong nuclear security measures are the most effective means to prevent terrorists, criminals, or other unauthorized actors from acquiring nuclear materials." With this commitment, the bar has been raised for all countries to reassess their current levels of engagement with one another in an effort to achieve a greater level of nuclear security. As President Obama stated in Prague on April 5, 2009, "one nuclear weapon exploded in one city- be it New York or Moscow, Islamabad, or Mumbai, Tokyo or Tel Aviv, Paris or Prague-could kill hundreds of thousands of people. And no matter where it happens, there is no end to what the consequences might be-for our global safety, our security, our society, our economy, to our ultimate survival."
The United States and Pakistan recently initiated a promising series of high level talks to develop a strategic relationship between the two countries. Even in pursuit of such an expanded bilateral agenda, however, lowering the risks associated with Pakistan's nuclear weapons must stand at the top of the list of priorities. Indeed, a key test of whether the two countries are able to develop a genuine partnership is whether the current levels of extreme sensitivity and mutual mistrust can be reduced, if not eliminated. In turn, this might lead to a shared sense of purpose that the proliferation and terrorism risks associated with nuclear weapons can be mitigated in ways that are less opaque, yet fully respectful of Pakistan's sovereignty.
In this spirit, the nuclear-related agenda for joint cooperation should concentrate on four strategic areas of engagement: understanding the risks associated with Pakistan's nuclear weapons program; considering broader trends that could impact Pakistan's nuclear security posture negatively; strengthening communications in case of a nuclear crisis; and increasing public outreach in Pakistan that counters the mysteries surrounding cooperation in this area of great national sensitivity.
To continue reading the paper, download the PDF below:
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Diplomat
Shifting Nuclear Sands in South Asia: Understanding India’s Counterforce Temptations
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
India’s Counterforce Temptations: Strategic Dilemmas, Doctrine, and Capabilities
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Revitalizing Nuclear Security in an Era of Uncertainty
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


