Journal Article - International Peacekeeping
The Case for Peacekeeping in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
The failure of Israeli–Palestinian negotiations to achieve a viable political settlement can be explained, in large part, by the lack of oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance with past UN resolutions and peace plans. The 2003 ‘road map’ calling for a final and comprehensive settlement of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict by 2005, like its predecessors, will be a rhetorical flourish unless it is accompanied by an institutionalized oversight mechanism. This article investigates the potential for deployment of an international peacekeeping mission to the Occupied Palestinian Territories that would consist of three parts: a basic security component led by NATO, a civilian peace building mission led by the UN, and a special monitoring presence around the holy sites in Jerusalem. This tri-partite peacekeeping mission might be deployed with the consent of the parties and given a Chapter VII mandate to be able to respond to special contingencies. The UN-authorized peacekeeping mission could be within the overall framework for ending the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip and establishing an independent Palestinian state.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Stephan, Maria J.. “The Case for Peacekeeping in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.” International Peacekeeping, vol. 11. no. 2. (Summer 2004): 248-270 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- National Post
Two Cheers for CANZUK — An Increasingly Important Alliance in an Uncertain World
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Analysis & Opinions
- CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: U.S. Image Plummets over Pandemic Response
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The failure of Israeli–Palestinian negotiations to achieve a viable political settlement can be explained, in large part, by the lack of oversight mechanisms to ensure compliance with past UN resolutions and peace plans. The 2003 ‘road map’ calling for a final and comprehensive settlement of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict by 2005, like its predecessors, will be a rhetorical flourish unless it is accompanied by an institutionalized oversight mechanism. This article investigates the potential for deployment of an international peacekeeping mission to the Occupied Palestinian Territories that would consist of three parts: a basic security component led by NATO, a civilian peace building mission led by the UN, and a special monitoring presence around the holy sites in Jerusalem. This tri-partite peacekeeping mission might be deployed with the consent of the parties and given a Chapter VII mandate to be able to respond to special contingencies. The UN-authorized peacekeeping mission could be within the overall framework for ending the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip and establishing an independent Palestinian state.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - National Post
Two Cheers for CANZUK — An Increasingly Important Alliance in an Uncertain World
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Analysis & Opinions - CNN
Nicholas Burns on CNN: U.S. Image Plummets over Pandemic Response
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


