Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict
Summary
The historical record indicates that nonviolent campaigns have been more successful than armed campaigns in achieving ultimate goals in political struggles, even when used against similar opponents and in the face of repression. Nonviolent campaigns are more likely to win legitimacy, attract widespread domestic and international support, neutralize the opponent’s security forces, and compel loyalty shifts among erstwhile opponent supporters than are armed campaigns, which enjoin the active support of a relatively small number of people, offer the opponent a justification for violent counterattacks, and are less likely to prompt loyalty shifts and defections. An original, aggregate data set of all known major nonviolent and violent resistance campaigns from 1900 to 2006 is used to test these claims. These dynamics are further explored in case studies of resistance campaigns in Southeast Asia that have featured periods of both violent and nonviolent resistance.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Maria J. Stephan and Erica Chenoweth. “Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Nonviolent Conflict.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 33. no. 1. (Summer 2008): 7-44 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Social Cohesion and Community Displacement in Armed Conflict
Newspaper Article
- Harvard Crimson
Kennedy School Postdoc Discusses Government-Sanctioned Mass Expulsion at Belfer Center Seminar
Journal Article
- Journal of Peace Research
Introducing the Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion Dataset
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio
- A Better Peace: The War Room Podcast
He Thought Like an Insurgent: Bernard Fall
Book
- Simon & Schuster
SPIES: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Domestic Intelligence
Summary
The historical record indicates that nonviolent campaigns have been more successful than armed campaigns in achieving ultimate goals in political struggles, even when used against similar opponents and in the face of repression. Nonviolent campaigns are more likely to win legitimacy, attract widespread domestic and international support, neutralize the opponent’s security forces, and compel loyalty shifts among erstwhile opponent supporters than are armed campaigns, which enjoin the active support of a relatively small number of people, offer the opponent a justification for violent counterattacks, and are less likely to prompt loyalty shifts and defections. An original, aggregate data set of all known major nonviolent and violent resistance campaigns from 1900 to 2006 is used to test these claims. These dynamics are further explored in case studies of resistance campaigns in Southeast Asia that have featured periods of both violent and nonviolent resistance.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Social Cohesion and Community Displacement in Armed Conflict
Newspaper Article - Harvard Crimson
Kennedy School Postdoc Discusses Government-Sanctioned Mass Expulsion at Belfer Center Seminar
Journal Article - Journal of Peace Research
Introducing the Government-Sponsored Mass Expulsion Dataset
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio - A Better Peace: The War Room Podcast
He Thought Like an Insurgent: Bernard Fall
Book - Simon & Schuster
SPIES: The Epic Intelligence War Between East and West
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Domestic Intelligence