Journal Article - Elsevier Inc. Energy Research & Social Science
Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas: Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance
Abstract
Stalling progress in European, Chinese and Latin American shale has been attributed to difficult geological formations and lacking data. Yet, ‘above ground’ factors matter in the extractive industries as much as geology. It is policies, regulation and institutional settings that determines the success or failure of a contested, risk bound technology such as fracking. This article suggests that a regulatory governance agenda may offer novel insights into shale gas as a policy phenomenon. The article first provides a critical review of the existing literature on shale gas and identifies the key themes of security, social contestations and socio-economic impact. It then turns to assessing the literature on policy regimes, regulatory competition, regulatory path dependence and regulatory agencies which, it is argued, form essential elements of a research agenda for investigating unconventional gas as a regulatory governance problem. Building on these, the paper sketches focal points of investigations going forward.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Goldthau, Andreass. “Conceptualizing the above ground factors in shale gas: Toward a research agenda on regulatory governance.” Energy Research & Social Science, (24 May 2016) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: Throwing Money at Green Energy Isn’t Enough
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
Pandemic Is Hurting, Not Helping, Green Energy
Analysis & Opinions
- Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: U.S.-China Split Will Hurt Clean Energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Stalling progress in European, Chinese and Latin American shale has been attributed to difficult geological formations and lacking data. Yet, ‘above ground’ factors matter in the extractive industries as much as geology. It is policies, regulation and institutional settings that determines the success or failure of a contested, risk bound technology such as fracking. This article suggests that a regulatory governance agenda may offer novel insights into shale gas as a policy phenomenon. The article first provides a critical review of the existing literature on shale gas and identifies the key themes of security, social contestations and socio-economic impact. It then turns to assessing the literature on policy regimes, regulatory competition, regulatory path dependence and regulatory agencies which, it is argued, form essential elements of a research agenda for investigating unconventional gas as a regulatory governance problem. Building on these, the paper sketches focal points of investigations going forward.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: Throwing Money at Green Energy Isn’t Enough
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
Pandemic Is Hurting, Not Helping, Green Energy
Analysis & Opinions - Bloomberg Opinion
After Oil: U.S.-China Split Will Hurt Clean Energy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


