Journal Article - Energy Policy
Integrated Assessment and Environmental Policy-Making: In Pursuit of Usefulness
Abstract
Current integrated assessment projects primarily seek end to end integration through formal models at a national to global scale, and show three significant representational weaknesses: determinants of decadal-scale emissions trends; valuing impacts and adaptive response; and the formation and effects of policies. Meeting the needs of policy audiences may require other forms of integration; may require integration by formal modeling or by other means; and may require representing decisions of other actors through political and negotiating processes. While rational global environmental policy making requires integrated assessment, current practice admits no single vision of how to do it, so understanding will be best advanced by a diverse collection of projects pursuing distinct methods and approaches. Further practice may yield some consensus on best practice, possibly including generic assessment skills generalizable across issues.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Parson, Edward A.. “Integrated Assessment and Environmental Policy-Making: In Pursuit of Usefulness.” Energy Policy, vol. 23. no. 4/5. (April / May 1995): 463-475 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Joseph Aldy Shares his Thoughts on Incorporating Green Energy into an Economic Stimulus Package: Lessons Learned from the 2009 Recovery Act
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Current integrated assessment projects primarily seek end to end integration through formal models at a national to global scale, and show three significant representational weaknesses: determinants of decadal-scale emissions trends; valuing impacts and adaptive response; and the formation and effects of policies. Meeting the needs of policy audiences may require other forms of integration; may require integration by formal modeling or by other means; and may require representing decisions of other actors through political and negotiating processes. While rational global environmental policy making requires integrated assessment, current practice admits no single vision of how to do it, so understanding will be best advanced by a diverse collection of projects pursuing distinct methods and approaches. Further practice may yield some consensus on best practice, possibly including generic assessment skills generalizable across issues.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Policy Brief
The Future of Carbon Offset Markets
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Joseph Aldy Shares his Thoughts on Incorporating Green Energy into an Economic Stimulus Package: Lessons Learned from the 2009 Recovery Act
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy

