Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Present at the Creation: Edward Mead Earle and the Depression-Era Origin of Security Studies
Security studies, as an American field of inquiry, has particular historical origins. Contrary to standard views, it was the unraveling of the international order in the 1930s that compelled a collection of internationalist institutions and individuals, led by historian Edward Mead Earle, to bind together a variety of new and traditional disciplines to create an entirely new field focused on the problem of security. These institutions and individuals not only sought to confront the crisis at hand by influencing public views, altering academic discussion, enhancing government capacity, and creating an American “grand strategy,” but also to establish strong institutional and intellectual foundations for an enduring scholarly project that would contended with future national security problems generated by the modern world. In this effort, Earle and his foundation, government, and university collaborators had significant influence on the evolution of security studies as a field that are still felt today.
Listen: Podcast of David Ekbladh and International Security editor Sean Lynn-Jones discussing this article.
Read Robert Vitalis's review of the article on ISSF, and view Ekbladh's response.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
David Ekbladh. “Present at the Creation: Edward Mead Earle and the Depression-Era Origin of Security Studies.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 36. no. 3. (Winter 2011/12): 107-141 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
COVID-19 Might Not Change the World
Journal Article
- Comparative Strategy
Geography, Great Power Rivalry and the Precarious Survival of Iran, 1860–1914
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Security studies, as an American field of inquiry, has particular historical origins. Contrary to standard views, it was the unraveling of the international order in the 1930s that compelled a collection of internationalist institutions and individuals, led by historian Edward Mead Earle, to bind together a variety of new and traditional disciplines to create an entirely new field focused on the problem of security. These institutions and individuals not only sought to confront the crisis at hand by influencing public views, altering academic discussion, enhancing government capacity, and creating an American “grand strategy,” but also to establish strong institutional and intellectual foundations for an enduring scholarly project that would contended with future national security problems generated by the modern world. In this effort, Earle and his foundation, government, and university collaborators had significant influence on the evolution of security studies as a field that are still felt today.
Listen: Podcast of David Ekbladh and International Security editor Sean Lynn-Jones discussing this article.
Read Robert Vitalis's review of the article on ISSF, and view Ekbladh's response.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
COVID-19 Might Not Change the World
Journal Article - Comparative Strategy
Geography, Great Power Rivalry and the Precarious Survival of Iran, 1860–1914
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


