Journal Article - Security Studies
Rational Idealism: The Political Economy of Internationalism in the United States and Great Britain, 1870-1945
Between 1870 and 1945, American and British leaders made a number of costly, “high politics” commitments to international law and multilateral cooperation. Of course, this period was not a golden age of peace and love; most of the time, foreign policymakers acted in their states’ parochial, short-term interests. The occasions in which they did initiate legalistic and multilateralist policies, however, were sufficiently common and had such a profound impact on the development of the international system that their actions cannot be dismissed as either aberrant or inconsequential. They revived the Concert of Europe as a progressive instrument of conflict resolution and humanitarian intervention, created the League of Nations and United Nations, settled long-running bilateral disputes through arbitration, and signed treaties requiring them to submit to conciliation and arbitration in future conflicts. They were not pacifists or isolationists, but rather believed that intervention and war should be subject to strict legal limits and sanctioned by multilateral organizations whenever possible. This approach to foreign policy has been known since the early twentieth century as internationalism.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Narizny, Kevin. “Rational Idealism: The Political Economy of Internationalism in the United States and Great Britain, 1870-1945.” Security Studies, vol. 12. no. 3. (Spring 2003): 1-39 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio
- Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Between 1870 and 1945, American and British leaders made a number of costly, “high politics” commitments to international law and multilateral cooperation. Of course, this period was not a golden age of peace and love; most of the time, foreign policymakers acted in their states’ parochial, short-term interests. The occasions in which they did initiate legalistic and multilateralist policies, however, were sufficiently common and had such a profound impact on the development of the international system that their actions cannot be dismissed as either aberrant or inconsequential. They revived the Concert of Europe as a progressive instrument of conflict resolution and humanitarian intervention, created the League of Nations and United Nations, settled long-running bilateral disputes through arbitration, and signed treaties requiring them to submit to conciliation and arbitration in future conflicts. They were not pacifists or isolationists, but rather believed that intervention and war should be subject to strict legal limits and sanctioned by multilateral organizations whenever possible. This approach to foreign policy has been known since the early twentieth century as internationalism.
To view full text please see PDF below (login may be required).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Audio - Radio Open Source
JFK in the American Century
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The Realist Case for the Non-Realist Biden
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
U.S. Diplomats and Spies Battle Trump Administration Over Suspected Attacks
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


