Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy
Abstract
Supporters of NATO enlargement contend that it will promote the spread of democracy, which in turn will lead to greater stability in Europe. Dan Reiter of Emory University disagrees. Reiter maintains that historical record—during and after the Cold War—fails to establish any correlation between NATO membership and the expansion of democracy. He also suggests that the costs and risks of NATO enlargement greatly exceed the potential benefits. Adding new members will only exacerbate tensions with Russia and diminish the likelihood of cooperation on a host of pressing security issues, including arms control and peacekeeping.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Dan Reiter. “Why NATO Enlargement Does Not Spread Democracy.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 25. no. 4. (Spring 2001): 41-67 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- National Post
Two Cheers for CANZUK — An Increasingly Important Alliance in an Uncertain World
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Europe's Post-Brexit Future Is Looking Scary
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
Supporters of NATO enlargement contend that it will promote the spread of democracy, which in turn will lead to greater stability in Europe. Dan Reiter of Emory University disagrees. Reiter maintains that historical record—during and after the Cold War—fails to establish any correlation between NATO membership and the expansion of democracy. He also suggests that the costs and risks of NATO enlargement greatly exceed the potential benefits. Adding new members will only exacerbate tensions with Russia and diminish the likelihood of cooperation on a host of pressing security issues, including arms control and peacekeeping.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - National Post
Two Cheers for CANZUK — An Increasingly Important Alliance in an Uncertain World
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Is the Blob Really Blameless?
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Europe's Post-Brexit Future Is Looking Scary
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


