Journal Article - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Air Quality, Health, and Climate Implications of China’s Synthetic Natural Gas Development
Abstract
Facing severe air pollution and growing dependence on natural gas imports, the Chinese government plans to increase coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) production. Although displacement of coal with SNG benefits air quality, it increases CO2 emissions. Due to variations in air pollutant and CO2 emission factors and energy efficiencies across sectors, coal replacement with SNG results in varying degrees of air quality benefits and climate penalties. We estimate air quality, human health, and climate impacts of SNG substitution strategies in 2020. Using all production of SNG in the residential sector results in an annual decrease of ∼32,000 (20,000 to 41,000) outdoor-air-pollution-associated premature deaths, with ranges determined by the low and high estimates of the health risks. If changes in indoor/household air pollution were also included, the decrease would be far larger. SNG deployment in the residential sector results in nearly 10 and 60 times greater reduction in premature mortality than if it is deployed in the industrial or power sectors, respectively. Due to inefficiencies in current household coal use, utilization of SNG in the residential sector results in only 20 to 30% of the carbon penalty compared with using it in the industrial or power sectors. Even if carbon capture and storage is used in SNG production with today’s technology, SNG emits 22 to 40% more CO2 than the same amount of conventional gas. Among the SNG deployment strategies we evaluate, allocating currently planned SNG to households provides the largest air quality and health benefits with the smallest carbon penalties.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Qin, Yue, Fabian Wagner, Noah Scovronick , Wei Peng, Junnan Yang, Tong Zhu, Kirk R. Smith and Denise L. Mauzerall . “Air Quality, Health, and Climate Implications of China’s Synthetic Natural Gas Development.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, (March 6, 2017) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Science of the Total Environment
Substantial Air Quality and Climate Co-benefits Achievable Now with Sectoral Mitigation Strategies in China
Journal Article
- Nature
Reduced Carbon Emission Estimates from Fossil Fuel Combustion and Cement Production in China
Journal Article
- Ecological Modelling
Four System Boundaries for Carbon Accounts
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
Who Will Invade Brazil to Save the Amazon?
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
We Don’t Need to Reinvent our Democracy to Save it from AI
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Abstract
Facing severe air pollution and growing dependence on natural gas imports, the Chinese government plans to increase coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) production. Although displacement of coal with SNG benefits air quality, it increases CO2 emissions. Due to variations in air pollutant and CO2 emission factors and energy efficiencies across sectors, coal replacement with SNG results in varying degrees of air quality benefits and climate penalties. We estimate air quality, human health, and climate impacts of SNG substitution strategies in 2020. Using all production of SNG in the residential sector results in an annual decrease of ∼32,000 (20,000 to 41,000) outdoor-air-pollution-associated premature deaths, with ranges determined by the low and high estimates of the health risks. If changes in indoor/household air pollution were also included, the decrease would be far larger. SNG deployment in the residential sector results in nearly 10 and 60 times greater reduction in premature mortality than if it is deployed in the industrial or power sectors, respectively. Due to inefficiencies in current household coal use, utilization of SNG in the residential sector results in only 20 to 30% of the carbon penalty compared with using it in the industrial or power sectors. Even if carbon capture and storage is used in SNG production with today’s technology, SNG emits 22 to 40% more CO2 than the same amount of conventional gas. Among the SNG deployment strategies we evaluate, allocating currently planned SNG to households provides the largest air quality and health benefits with the smallest carbon penalties.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Science of the Total Environment
Substantial Air Quality and Climate Co-benefits Achievable Now with Sectoral Mitigation Strategies in China
Journal Article - Nature
Reduced Carbon Emission Estimates from Fossil Fuel Combustion and Cement Production in China
Journal Article - Ecological Modelling
Four System Boundaries for Carbon Accounts
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
Who Will Invade Brazil to Save the Amazon?
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
We Don’t Need to Reinvent our Democracy to Save it from AI
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It