International Security

International Security is America's leading peer-reviewed journal of security affairs.

International Security
Article
from International Security

Caught Red-Handed: How States Wield Proof to Coerce Wrongdoers

READ FULL ARTICLE
Ambassador Ivor Richard, left, of the United Kingdom, and U.S. Ambassador Andrew Young, right, raise their arms during vote, Friday, Nov. 4, 1977 at the United Nations Security Council.
Ambassador Ivor Richard, left, of the United Kingdom, and U.S. Ambassador Andrew Young, right, raise their arms during vote, Friday, Nov. 4, 1977 at the United Nations Security Council. The council Friday unanimously slapped a mandatory and permanent arms embargo against South Africa, declaring that Pretoria's Acquisition of weapons is a threat to international peace and security. The sanctions were adopted by a show-of-hands.

Summary

States frequently acquire proof that other states have violated norms. Yet, existing theories do not fully explain how states that catch others red-handed use such proof to coerce wrongdoers. Four case studies of nuclear proliferation—Taiwan, Libya, South Africa, and North Korea—probe a novel theory of how discoverers may conceal proof of wrongdoing, share such proof with other actors privately, or reveal their proof to the world. These cases illustrate how coercive power affects states’ decision-making regarding use of proof.

Recommended citation

Cullen G. Nutt and Reid B.C. Pauly, "Caught Red-Handed: How States Wield Proof to Coerce Wrongdoers," International Security, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Fall 2021), pp. 7–50, doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00421.

Want to read more?

The full text of this publication is available in the link below.

Up Next