Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security

The Psychology of Nuclear Brinkmanship

| Winter 2022/23

Summary

Conventional wisdom sees nuclear brinkmanship and Thomas Schelling’s pathbreaking “threat that leaves something to chance” as a solution to the problem of agency in coercion. If leaders cannot credibly threaten to start a nuclear war, perhaps they can at least introduce uncertainty by signaling that the decision is out of their hands. But human emotions can introduce chance into bargaining in ways that contradict the expectations of the rational cost-benefit assumptions that undergird deterrence theory. 

Downloads

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:

Reid B. C. Pauly and Rose McDermott, "The Psychology of Nuclear Brinkmanship," International Security 47, no. 3 (Winter 2022/23): 9–51, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00451.  

The Authors

Rose McDermott

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
The U.S. and Canada must work together on Arctic climate challenges that have global impacts, from intensifying wildfires and thawing permafrost to endangered Indigenous subsistence and a changing Arctic Ocean, write John P. Holdren and Fran Ulmer.
We’re going to need every tool in the toolkit, including CCUS, to solve the climate crisis, argues Mohammed Al-Juaied. CCUS projects are already burying millions of tons of CO2 each year, but that’s a drop in the bucket compared to what’s needed, he says.
When the Boston Marathon bombing took place 10 years ago, the City’s detailed disaster preparedness plan kicked in and helped save numerous lives, Juliette Kayyem and other experts said in a recent discussion of lessons learned in the wake of the tragedy.
Most Viewed

Tags