Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Collapse of North Korea: Military Missions and Requirements
In North Korea, the upcoming leadership transition in the Kim Jong-il regime will be a precarious time for the Kim family’s hold on power. A collapse of the North Korean government could have several dangerous implications for East Asia, including “loose nukes,” a humanitarian disaster, a regional refugee crisis, and potential escalation to war between China and the United States. To respond to a collapse and these problems, neighboring countries may perform several military missions to stabilize North Korea. These include the location and securing of North Korean weapons of mass destruction, stability operations, border control, conventional disarmament, and combat/deterrence operations. Assuming that collapse occurs in a relatively benign manner, military missions to stabilize North Korea could require 260,000 to 400,000 troops. If collapse occurs after a war on the peninsula, or if it sparks civil war in North Korea, the number of missions—and their requirements—would grow. Because of the size and complexity of these missions, and because of the perils associated with mismanaging them, advance and combined planning is essential. Combined planning should include those actors (e.g., China, South Korea, and the United States) that could otherwise take destabilizing action to protect their own interests.
Read Brendan M. Howe's review of "The Collapse of North Korea," additional comments by Thomas Nichols, and the author's response to both critics, all at H-Diplo's International Security Studies Forum (ISSF).
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Bruce W. Bennett and Jennifer Lind. “The Collapse of North Korea: Military Missions and Requirements.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 2. no. 36. (Fall 2011): 84-119 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Women in Public Policy Program, Harvard Kennedy School
- Belfer Center's Korea Project Co-Leads Planning for South Korean President's Historic Harvard Visit and Speech
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Dilemmas of Deterrence
Analysis & Opinions
- The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Blog Post
- Views on the Economy and the World
High Oil Prices Can Help the Environment
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Future Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, U.S. AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia
Journal Article
- Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology
In North Korea, the upcoming leadership transition in the Kim Jong-il regime will be a precarious time for the Kim family’s hold on power. A collapse of the North Korean government could have several dangerous implications for East Asia, including “loose nukes,” a humanitarian disaster, a regional refugee crisis, and potential escalation to war between China and the United States. To respond to a collapse and these problems, neighboring countries may perform several military missions to stabilize North Korea. These include the location and securing of North Korean weapons of mass destruction, stability operations, border control, conventional disarmament, and combat/deterrence operations. Assuming that collapse occurs in a relatively benign manner, military missions to stabilize North Korea could require 260,000 to 400,000 troops. If collapse occurs after a war on the peninsula, or if it sparks civil war in North Korea, the number of missions—and their requirements—would grow. Because of the size and complexity of these missions, and because of the perils associated with mismanaging them, advance and combined planning is essential. Combined planning should include those actors (e.g., China, South Korea, and the United States) that could otherwise take destabilizing action to protect their own interests.
Read Brendan M. Howe's review of "The Collapse of North Korea," additional comments by Thomas Nichols, and the author's response to both critics, all at H-Diplo's International Security Studies Forum (ISSF).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Women in Public Policy Program, Harvard Kennedy School
-Belfer Center's Korea Project Co-Leads Planning for South Korean President's Historic Harvard Visit and Speech
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Dilemmas of Deterrence
Analysis & Opinions - The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Blog Post - Views on the Economy and the World
High Oil Prices Can Help the Environment
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Future Warfare in the Western Pacific: Chinese Antiaccess/Area Denial, U.S. AirSea Battle, and Command of the Commons in East Asia
Journal Article - Research Policy
The Relationship Between Science and Technology