Journal Article - International Security

Correspondence: The Limits of Damage Limitation

| Summer 2017

Abstract

Brendan Rittenhouse Green and Austin Long; and Matthew Kroenig respond to Charles Glaser and Steve Fetter's summer 2016 article, "Should the United States Reject MAD? Damage Limitation and U.S. Nuclear Strategy toward China."

Want to Read More?

The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
Read Full Article
For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:

Brendan Rittenhouse Green and Austin Long; Matthew Kroenig; and Charles Glaser and Steve Fetter, "Correspondence: The Limits of Damage Limitation," International Security, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Summer 2017), pp. 193–207.

The Authors

Austin Long

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
By 2050, DACCS appears likely to remove only about 1% of current emissions of fossil carbon, making only a small contribution to meeting 2050 net zero targets, write Mohammed Al-Juaied and Adam Whitmore.
As much as we laud LBJ’s political prowess in moving domestic legislation, some of those same attributes led him and the nation deeper into the jungles of Vietnam, write Fredrik Logevall and Julian Zelizer.
The most likely result of a Trump administration for Ukraine may be radically diminished U.S. support, causing Russia to make new battlefield gains and perhaps an imposed peace, writes Anatol Lieven in Russia Matters.
Most Viewed

Tags