Article
from The New York Times

Crucial Questions Remain as Iran Nuclear Talks Approach Deadline

READ FULL ARTICLE

Iran’s top nuclear negotiator was heading back to Tehran on Sunday to consult with his nation’s leadership, as negotiators remained divided over how to limit and monitor Tehran’s nuclear program and even on how to interpret the preliminary agreement they reached two months ago.

With all sides now acknowledging that the talks would need to continue beyond Tuesday, once considered the absolute deadline for a final deal, officials from several nations said some of the politically difficult questions — from inspections to how fast Iran could expand its nuclear infrastructure in the waning years of an accord — are still just as vexing as they were when the 18-month negotiation odyssey began.

For Secretary of State John Kerry, for whom an Iran deal would be the crowning achievement of his time in office, how the talks proceed this week will determine whether he can make a convincing argument to skeptics in Congress that he has negotiated an airtight freeze on the program for at least a decade while hobbling Iran’s ability to race for a bomb for years thereafter.

For Mr. Kerry’s counterpart, Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s foreign minister, the obstacles to achieving his No. 1 goal — getting the crippling sanctions on Iran lifted — are a tricky mix of both substance and perception.

See here for full text of article.

Recommended citation

Sanger, David and Michael R. Gordon. “Crucial Questions Remain as Iran Nuclear Talks Approach Deadline.” The New York Times, June 28, 2015

Want to read more?

The full text of this publication is available via The New York Times.

Chemical & biological weapons Conflict & Conflict Resolution Energy Energy Innovation Policy Globalization Governance International Cooperation International Relations International Security & Defense Iran's Nuclear Program Middle East & North Africa Middle East Policy Negotiation North America Nuclear Issues Nuclear Proliferation Nuclear Waste Nuclear Weapons Nuclear power Rogue/ Repressive States Science & Technology Science & Technology Policy Security Strategy U.S. Nuclear Issues U.S. domestic politics Weapons of Mass Destruction
Up Next