Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
-Julius Weitzdörfer: Managing the Impact of Nuclear Disasters
Julius Weitzdörfer is a Stanton Nuclear Security Junior Faculty Fellow
Julius Weitzdörfer’s earliest childhood memories are the major global events of 1986—the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion and the Chernobyl disaster. Looking back, he realizes that these events must have contributed to shaping his later research interests in managing technological risks.
Weitzdörfer is a Stanton Nuclear Security Junior Faculty Fellow at the Belfer Center, following four years at the Center for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge, England. At the Belfer Center, he studies recovery from nuclear or radiological disasters as a joint fellow with the Project on Managing the Atom and the International Security Program.
Weitzdörfer, who spent three years in Japan, including in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, focuses his research on the law and policy responses of the Japanese government.
Among the foundations of risk management is the idea that “every risk has a probability side and an impact side,” he said. “If you want to reduce the risk, of course it’s good to reduce the probability, but you can also make progress by reducing the potential impact of the event.”
Triage, evacuation, resettlement, decontamination, and, if possible, returning to the site of a disaster, are all important for rebuilding communities and economies following a nuclear incident. The faster these steps happen, the better for everyone. In Fukushima, every year people have been unable to return has cost the country an additional $10 billion. Weitzdörfer hopes policies can be established to better prepare for nuclear “error and terror” scenarios—wherever they happen.
“The atom is quite literally the smallest scale thing for a policymaker to think about... But on the other hand, the consequences of bad management of the atom—nuclear war—would be likely the most existential and largest scale issue a policymaker could think of.”
“Future generations will not forgive us,” Weitzdörfer said, “if we do not govern nuclear technologies responsibly and sustainably.”
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Carey, Brilee. "Julius Weitzdörfer: Managing the Impact of Nuclear Disasters." Belfer Center Newsletter, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. (Fall/Winter 2019-2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The New York Times
Could There Be a Terrorist Fukushima?
Blog Post
- Nuclear Security Matters
Belgium Highlights the Nuclear Terrorism Threat and Security Measures to Stop it
Blog Post
- Technology and Policy
China’s Nuclear Energy Industry, One Year After Fukushima
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Arctic Climate Science: A Way Forward for Cooperation through the Arctic Council and Beyond
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Julius Weitzdörfer’s earliest childhood memories are the major global events of 1986—the Space Shuttle Challenger explosion and the Chernobyl disaster. Looking back, he realizes that these events must have contributed to shaping his later research interests in managing technological risks.
Weitzdörfer is a Stanton Nuclear Security Junior Faculty Fellow at the Belfer Center, following four years at the Center for the Study of Existential Risk at Cambridge, England. At the Belfer Center, he studies recovery from nuclear or radiological disasters as a joint fellow with the Project on Managing the Atom and the International Security Program.
Weitzdörfer, who spent three years in Japan, including in the wake of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, focuses his research on the law and policy responses of the Japanese government.
Among the foundations of risk management is the idea that “every risk has a probability side and an impact side,” he said. “If you want to reduce the risk, of course it’s good to reduce the probability, but you can also make progress by reducing the potential impact of the event.”
Triage, evacuation, resettlement, decontamination, and, if possible, returning to the site of a disaster, are all important for rebuilding communities and economies following a nuclear incident. The faster these steps happen, the better for everyone. In Fukushima, every year people have been unable to return has cost the country an additional $10 billion. Weitzdörfer hopes policies can be established to better prepare for nuclear “error and terror” scenarios—wherever they happen.
“The atom is quite literally the smallest scale thing for a policymaker to think about... But on the other hand, the consequences of bad management of the atom—nuclear war—would be likely the most existential and largest scale issue a policymaker could think of.”
“Future generations will not forgive us,” Weitzdörfer said, “if we do not govern nuclear technologies responsibly and sustainably.”
Carey, Brilee. "Julius Weitzdörfer: Managing the Impact of Nuclear Disasters." Belfer Center Newsletter, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. (Fall/Winter 2019-2020).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The New York Times
Could There Be a Terrorist Fukushima?
Blog Post - Nuclear Security Matters
Belgium Highlights the Nuclear Terrorism Threat and Security Measures to Stop it
Blog Post - Technology and Policy
China’s Nuclear Energy Industry, One Year After Fukushima
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Arctic Climate Science: A Way Forward for Cooperation through the Arctic Council and Beyond
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It