Paper

Legalizing Nuclear Abandonment: The Determinants of Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaty Ratification

| March 14, 2008

Matthew Fuhrmann and co-author Xiaojun Li examine when and why states ratify regional nuclear weapons free zone (NWFZ) treaties. Integrating insights from the literatures on legal commitment and nuclear proliferation, Fuhrmann and Li test several hypotheses using event history analysis and a sample of all 109 states that are eligible to join NWFZs. They find that expectations of future conflict with the nuclear powers make states more likely to ratify NWFZ treaties and factors that might compel states to pursue nuclear weapons — such as militarized conflict and the presence of nuclear-related resources — make states less likely to do so. They find only limited support for the argument that normative or reputation-based benefits influence states' decisions to join NWFZs.

Downloads

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation: Fuhrmann, Matthew and Xiaojun Li. “Legalizing Nuclear Abandonment: The Determinants of Nuclear Weapon Free Zone Treaty Ratification.” Paper, March 14, 2008.

The Authors

Xiaojun Li

Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
By 2050, DACCS appears likely to remove only about 1% of current emissions of fossil carbon, making only a small contribution to meeting 2050 net zero targets, write Mohammed Al-Juaied and Adam Whitmore.
As much as we laud LBJ’s political prowess in moving domestic legislation, some of those same attributes led him and the nation deeper into the jungles of Vietnam, write Fredrik Logevall and Julian Zelizer.
The most likely result of a Trump administration for Ukraine may be radically diminished U.S. support, causing Russia to make new battlefield gains and perhaps an imposed peace, writes Anatol Lieven in Russia Matters.
Most Viewed

Tags