Journal Article - MRS Energy & Sustainability
Nurturing Transformative U.S. Energy Research: Two Guiding Principles
Abstract
Energy research is critical to continuing advances in human productivity and welfare. In this Commentary, we raise for debate and discussion what in our view is a growing mis-control and mis-protection of U.S. energy research. This flawed approach originates in natural human tendencies exacerbated by an historical misunderstanding of research and development, science and technology, and the relationships between them. We outline the origin of the mis-control and mis-protection, and propose two guiding principles to mitigate them and instead nurture research: (i) focus on people, not projects; and (ii) culturally insulate research from development, but not science from technology. Our hope is to introduce these principles into the discourse now, so they can help guide policy changes in U.S. energy research and development that are currently being driven by powerful geopolitical winds.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Science, Technology, and Public Policy
For Academic Citation:
Narayanamurti, Venkatesh and Jeffrey Y. Tsao. "Nurturing Transformative U.S. Energy Research: Two Guiding Principles." MRS Energy & Sustainability, vol. 5. no. 10. (September 17, 2018): 1–8
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Research Policy
Simultaneous Pursuit of Discovery and Invention in the US Department of Energy
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Department of Energy National Laboratories
Journal Article
- Nature Energy
Rescue US Energy Innovation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio
- Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
News
- Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28
Abstract
Energy research is critical to continuing advances in human productivity and welfare. In this Commentary, we raise for debate and discussion what in our view is a growing mis-control and mis-protection of U.S. energy research. This flawed approach originates in natural human tendencies exacerbated by an historical misunderstanding of research and development, science and technology, and the relationships between them. We outline the origin of the mis-control and mis-protection, and propose two guiding principles to mitigate them and instead nurture research: (i) focus on people, not projects; and (ii) culturally insulate research from development, but not science from technology. Our hope is to introduce these principles into the discourse now, so they can help guide policy changes in U.S. energy research and development that are currently being driven by powerful geopolitical winds.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.Narayanamurti, Venkatesh and Jeffrey Y. Tsao. "Nurturing Transformative U.S. Energy Research: Two Guiding Principles." MRS Energy & Sustainability, vol. 5. no. 10. (September 17, 2018): 1–8
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Research Policy
Simultaneous Pursuit of Discovery and Invention in the US Department of Energy
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Department of Energy National Laboratories
Journal Article - Nature Energy
Rescue US Energy Innovation
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Audio - Harvard Environmental Economics Program
Previewing COP 28: A Conversation with Nat Keohane
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Oil, Conflict, and U.S. National Interests
News - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
Harvard Project to Conduct Panel on Methane Emissions Abatement at COP-28