Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies
Abstract
In recent years rational choice theory has experienced a surge in popularity among political scientists. Its usefulness, however, remains highly controversial. In our lead article, Stephen Walt of the University of Chicago argues that the outcome of this debate will have deep and long-lasting consequences for scholarly discourse. Given that the stakes are so high, Walt contends that if rational choice theory is to achieve general acceptance, it must be "precise, logically consistent, original, and empirically valid." Applying these criteria to several prominent formal theory works in security studies, Walt concludes that in general rational choice methods fail to offer new insights into the study of security issues.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Stephen M. Walt. “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 23. no. 4. (Spring 1999): 5-48 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- International Theory
Conceptualizing Interstate Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions
- The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
Analysis & Opinions
- The Straits Times
US-China ties: Averting the grandest collision of all
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Military Rivalry: China vs the U.S.
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China
Abstract
In recent years rational choice theory has experienced a surge in popularity among political scientists. Its usefulness, however, remains highly controversial. In our lead article, Stephen Walt of the University of Chicago argues that the outcome of this debate will have deep and long-lasting consequences for scholarly discourse. Given that the stakes are so high, Walt contends that if rational choice theory is to achieve general acceptance, it must be "precise, logically consistent, original, and empirically valid." Applying these criteria to several prominent formal theory works in security studies, Walt concludes that in general rational choice methods fail to offer new insights into the study of security issues.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - International Theory
Conceptualizing Interstate Cooperation
Analysis & Opinions - The Diplomat
What's Driving the Japan–South Korea Thaw?
Analysis & Opinions - The Straits Times
US-China ties: Averting the grandest collision of all
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
What Caused the Ukraine War?
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Great Military Rivalry: China vs the U.S.
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Significance of the Iran-Saudi Arabia Agreement Brokered by China