Article
from Science

The Science of Fake News

READ FULL ARTICLE
Andrew Wakefield arrives at the General Medical Council in London to face a disciplinary panel investigating allegations of serious professional misconduct.
In this July 16, 2007 file photo Andrew Wakefield arrives at the General Medical Council in London to face a disciplinary panel investigating allegations of serious professional misconduct. Wakefield's work first linked vaccines and autism but it has since been discredited. Amid a measles outbreak in Minnesota, he has been meeting with local Somalis in Minneapolis. Some worry Wakefield is stoking vaccination fears, though organizers say the meetings are merely informational discussions.

Summary

The rise of fake news highlights the erosion of long-standing institutional bulwarks against misinformation in the internet age. Concern over the problem is global. However, much remains unknown regarding the vulnerabilities of individuals, institutions, and society to manipulations by malicious actors. A new system of safeguards is needed. Below, we discuss extant social and computer science research regarding belief in fake news and the mechanisms by which it spreads. Fake news has a long history, but we focus on unanswered scientific questions raised by the proliferation of its most recent, politically oriented incarnation. Beyond selected references in the text, suggested further reading can be found in the supplementary materials.

Recommended citation

Lazer, David M J, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M. Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, Michael Schudson, Steven A Sloman, Cass R. Sunstein, Emily A Thorson, Duncan J Watts and Jonathan L Zittrain. "The Science of Fake News." Science, vol. 359. no. 6380. (March 8, 2018): 1094–1096.

Want to read more?

The full text of this publication is available via Science.