Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
A Theory of Engagement With North Korea
At the Hanoi Summit in February 2019, the United States and North Korea reached a familiar impasse—diplomacy broke down over the appropriate order of near-term steps, and the world was left wondering whether any package of rewards would be enough to incentivize denuclearization.
In a new Managing the Atom Discussion Paper, Christopher Lawrence outlines an alternative conceptual framework for engaging North Korea. Rather than offering rewards for nuclear rollback, the approach focuses on building credibility around the notion of a shared political future. Lawrence suggests that physical actions—such as shared investments in integrated rail, electricity, or mining infrastructure—speak more credibly about the political future for all the parties involved than do written commitments or more transient “carrots” and “sticks.” The international relationships created by infrastructure projects may alter North Korea's security calculus over time, and incrementally reduce its dependence on nuclear weapons. Drawing lessons from the 1994 Agreed Framework, Lawrence reinterprets the history of nonproliferation engagement with North Korea, and illuminates possible opportunities to break the diplomatic impasse after the Hanoi summit.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Christopher Lawrence, “A Theory of Engagement with North Korea,” Discussion Paper 2019-02, (Cambridge, Mass.: Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, May 2019).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Australian Outlook
The Hanoi Trump-Kim Summit: Personal Chemistry Fizzles
Analysis & Opinions
- The Diplomat
After the Hanoi Summit: Next Steps for the US, North Korea, and Vietnam
Analysis & Opinions
- War on the Rocks
A Window into Kim's Nuclear Intentions? A Closer Look at North Korea's Yongbyon Offer
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions
- The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination
At the Hanoi Summit in February 2019, the United States and North Korea reached a familiar impasse—diplomacy broke down over the appropriate order of near-term steps, and the world was left wondering whether any package of rewards would be enough to incentivize denuclearization.
In a new Managing the Atom Discussion Paper, Christopher Lawrence outlines an alternative conceptual framework for engaging North Korea. Rather than offering rewards for nuclear rollback, the approach focuses on building credibility around the notion of a shared political future. Lawrence suggests that physical actions—such as shared investments in integrated rail, electricity, or mining infrastructure—speak more credibly about the political future for all the parties involved than do written commitments or more transient “carrots” and “sticks.” The international relationships created by infrastructure projects may alter North Korea's security calculus over time, and incrementally reduce its dependence on nuclear weapons. Drawing lessons from the 1994 Agreed Framework, Lawrence reinterprets the history of nonproliferation engagement with North Korea, and illuminates possible opportunities to break the diplomatic impasse after the Hanoi summit.
Christopher Lawrence, “A Theory of Engagement with North Korea,” Discussion Paper 2019-02, (Cambridge, Mass.: Project on Managing the Atom, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, May 2019).
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Australian Outlook
The Hanoi Trump-Kim Summit: Personal Chemistry Fizzles
Analysis & Opinions - The Diplomat
After the Hanoi Summit: Next Steps for the US, North Korea, and Vietnam
Analysis & Opinions - War on the Rocks
A Window into Kim's Nuclear Intentions? A Closer Look at North Korea's Yongbyon Offer
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
National Cyber Power Index 2022
Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Attacking Artificial Intelligence: AI’s Security Vulnerability and What Policymakers Can Do About It
Analysis & Opinions - The Sunday Times
China is Using Every Trick for World Domination