Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Winning Weapon? Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima
Abstract
This article reexamines the widely held presumption that nuclear weapons played a decisive role in winning the war in the Pacific. Based on new research from Japanese, Soviet, and U.S. archives, it concludes that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, played virtually no role in this outcome. A comparison of the responses of high-level Japanese officials to the bombing and the Soviet invasion on August 9 makes clear that the Soviet intervention touched off a crisis, while the bombing of Hiroshima did not. The article examines the evidence that, to save face, Japanese leaders blamed the bomb for losing the war. Finally, it sketches the profound impact this reappraisal may have on how nuclear weapons will be viewed in the future.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Wilson, Ward. “The Winning Weapon? Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 31. no. 4. (Spring 2007): 162-179 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- TIME Magazine
Is America in Decline?
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Journal Article
- Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs
The "Age of Normalizations"— An Overdue Post-Mortem
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?
Abstract
This article reexamines the widely held presumption that nuclear weapons played a decisive role in winning the war in the Pacific. Based on new research from Japanese, Soviet, and U.S. archives, it concludes that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, played virtually no role in this outcome. A comparison of the responses of high-level Japanese officials to the bombing and the Soviet invasion on August 9 makes clear that the Soviet intervention touched off a crisis, while the bombing of Hiroshima did not. The article examines the evidence that, to save face, Japanese leaders blamed the bomb for losing the war. Finally, it sketches the profound impact this reappraisal may have on how nuclear weapons will be viewed in the future.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - TIME Magazine
Is America in Decline?
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
How to Prevent a War Over Taiwan
Journal Article - Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs
The "Age of Normalizations"— An Overdue Post-Mortem
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
Challenging Biases and Assumptions in Analysis: Could Israel Have Averted Intelligence Failure?
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Is Iran's Strategic Patience at an End?