Reports & Papers

Augmentation Nation

Strategic, Operational, and Governance Implications of Human Enhancement Technologies for the U.S.

Download the Full Report
Cover Image of "Augmentation Nation"

Executive Summary

Human augmentation technologies, from brain-computer interfaces to gene-modulated endurance and wearable neuroprosthetics, are rapidly evolving from experimental concepts to field-ready tools. As global competition intensifies, adversaries like China and Russia are accelerating development through state-integrated, ethically permissive approaches that threaten to erode U.S. technological and normative leadership.

While the United States leads in core scientific research and innovation, its human augmentation efforts remain fragmented across civilian and defense institutions. There is currently no unified strategy, command authority, or operational framework guiding the transition of these technologies from lab to field. This institutional disconnection risks strategic delay and vulnerability, even as authoritarian competitors push forward with integrated, militarized programs.

This policy brief argues that the U.S. must treat human augmentation as a critical defense domain on par with cyber or space, and act swiftly to consolidate its programs, define ethical and legal red lines, and lead in shaping international governance norms. Without decisive action, the U.S. risks ceding both battlefield advantage and moral authority in a domain that will define the next generation of warfare. Delay is not neutrality; delay is decline.

What follows is a comparative analysis of global approaches, a synthesis of operational and strategic challenges, and a set of six targeted policy proposals to reassert U.S. leadership in the bio-digital era.

Recommendation 1: DARPA & Threat Review Board - Continue investing in DARPA-led human augmentation research to maintain U.S. technological dominance. Establish a cross-branch review board with cybersecurity experts, intelligence analysts, and private contractors to assess vulnerabilities and prevent misuse. This ensures innovation is paired with proactive threat mitigation.

Recommendation 2: Invest in Key R&D - Scale federal investment in critical technologies like neural interfaces, exoskeletons, and gene therapies. Coordinate efforts across DARPA, NIH, and ARPA-H to accelerate breakthroughs and counter adversary advances. Transition discoveries to defense use and allied collaboration to maintain global leadership.

Recommendation 3: Interagency Coordination Task Force - Create a National Human Augmentation Initiative led by the White House to unify efforts across defense, health, energy, and tech agencies. This ensures military needs guide civilian research and civilian breakthroughs are rapidly adapted for national security. Better coordination also enhances regulation, resilience, and messaging.

Recommendation 4: Public-Private Innovation Partnerships - Forge deeper partnerships with startups, universities, and biotech firms to tap into non-traditional innovation pipelines. Launch prize challenges, co-research centers, and rapid contracting models to scale promising technologies. Broad collaboration enables agile development and industrial resilience against foreign dominance.

Recommendation 5: Build a Talent Pipeline - Develop a national bio-digital talent strategy through scholarships, fellowships, and military career tracks in human augmentation. Train scientists, engineers, and warfighters with specialized skills to implement and manage emerging technologies. A strong, diverse talent pool ensures U.S. leadership and resilience in the field.

Recommendation 6: Allied Ethical Red Lines - Lead efforts with NATO, Five Eyes, and Quad partners to define shared ethical boundaries such as banning non-consensual enhancement or inheritable gene edits. Use multilateral platforms to coordinate positions and launch workshops to build consensus. Link violations to diplomatic tools like sanctions and export controls.

Recommendation 7: Ethics-by-Design Advantage - Embed transparency, reversibility, and consent into augmentation systems from the start. Leverage existing ethical review frameworks and align with allied values to build trust and legitimacy. Ethics becomes a strategic edge that reinforces democratic innovation over authoritarian coercion.

Recommendation 8: Lead on Global Norms - Launch diplomatic initiatives to shape global rules on human enhancement before rivals do. Start with allies to build coalitions and eventually engage adversaries on transparency and restraint. Setting norms early aligns security interests with democratic values and prevents destabilizing arms races.

Recommended citation

Bhayana, Aditya, Rupen Dajee and Sarah Davis. “Augmentation Nation.”