Journal Article - Cambridge University Press
Private banking and crony capitalism in Egypt
Abstract
Why do private banks lend preferentially to politically connected firms? Focusing on the case of Egypt during the later years of Mubarak’s rule, we identified politically connected firms, and we documented, using the Orbis corporate data on large firms in Egypt, that they received a disproportionate amount of the loans going to the private sector during 2003–11. We then investigated the determinants of their borrowings, and we found evidence that connected firms were more attractive to banks both because they made larger profits, and because they were seen to be implicitly guaranteed by the state against failure. We also found evidence that non-connected firms had a lower demand for loans.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Diwan, Ishac and Marc Schiffbauer. “Private banking and crony capitalism in Egypt.” , (March 1, 2018) .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
Creating Jobs Through Pro-Market Rather than Pro-Business Policies
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Egypt and Tunisia’s Divergent Paths
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership
Abstract
Why do private banks lend preferentially to politically connected firms? Focusing on the case of Egypt during the later years of Mubarak’s rule, we identified politically connected firms, and we documented, using the Orbis corporate data on large firms in Egypt, that they received a disproportionate amount of the loans going to the private sector during 2003–11. We then investigated the determinants of their borrowings, and we found evidence that connected firms were more attractive to banks both because they made larger profits, and because they were seen to be implicitly guaranteed by the state against failure. We also found evidence that non-connected firms had a lower demand for loans.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
Creating Jobs Through Pro-Market Rather than Pro-Business Policies
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Egypt and Tunisia’s Divergent Paths
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Report - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs
David Petraeus on Strategic Leadership


