Analysis & Opinions - The Boston Globe
Prof. Doty Explains Views in a Letter
The decision which the Faculty faces on Tuesday with respect to the Vietnam War motion may be of such consequence that I should like to correct beforehand some misrepresentations of my own involvement in the issue.
During the discussions of the past week I withheld my support until a clearly worded statement could be agreed upon. The statement of the motion published in the Crimson on Friday met most of my objections and I can support it.
At the same time I insisted that no faculty member should be coerced in any way into supporting or rejecting such a motion if he did not choose to express his attitude on the war in this manner. Indeed I had suggested that a prior vote might be taken on the appropriateness of considering in the issue.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Doty, Paul.“Prof. Doty Explains Views in a Letter.” The Boston Globe, October 7, 1969.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
Correspondence: Clandestine Capabilities and Technological Diffusion Risks
Analysis & Opinions
- The National Interest
Leave the Draft in the Past
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The decision which the Faculty faces on Tuesday with respect to the Vietnam War motion may be of such consequence that I should like to correct beforehand some misrepresentations of my own involvement in the issue.
During the discussions of the past week I withheld my support until a clearly worded statement could be agreed upon. The statement of the motion published in the Crimson on Friday met most of my objections and I can support it.
At the same time I insisted that no faculty member should be coerced in any way into supporting or rejecting such a motion if he did not choose to express his attitude on the war in this manner. Indeed I had suggested that a prior vote might be taken on the appropriateness of considering in the issue.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
Correspondence: Clandestine Capabilities and Technological Diffusion Risks
Analysis & Opinions - The National Interest
Leave the Draft in the Past
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


