Paper - Institute of Nuclear Materials Management
Regaining Nuclear Security Momentum
The 2010-2016 nuclear security summit process focused leaders’ attention on nuclear security and preventing nuclear terrorism. Momentum has waned since the final summit in 2016. Despite continuing nuclear security improvements in some countries, and ongoing efforts to maintain or strengthen the international nuclear security framework, serious vulnerabilities still exist in nuclear security systems around the world. Many nuclear facilities are not protected against all of the plausible threats adversaries might pose—especially in the case of threats from insiders. Nuclear materials remain unnecessarily vulnerable in too many locations. The culture within many nuclear organizations is insufficiently focused on security. Many nuclear security systems are not being exposed to sufficiently in-depth, creative, and realistic vulnerability assessments and testing. This paper will summarize the post-summit evolution of nuclear security efforts and offer recommendations for regaining international nuclear security momentum through combating complacency, improving implementation on the ground, strengthening frameworks for international cooperation, and maintaining nuclear security leadership.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Roth, Nickolas and Matthew Bunn. “Regaining Nuclear Security Momentum.” Paper, Institute of Nuclear Materials Management, July 2018.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- The Hill
Rhetoric Aside, the US Commitment to Preventing Nuclear Terrorism is Waning
Analysis & Opinions
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Effects of a Single Terrorist Nuclear Bomb
Journal Article
- Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The future of US–Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
The 2010-2016 nuclear security summit process focused leaders’ attention on nuclear security and preventing nuclear terrorism. Momentum has waned since the final summit in 2016. Despite continuing nuclear security improvements in some countries, and ongoing efforts to maintain or strengthen the international nuclear security framework, serious vulnerabilities still exist in nuclear security systems around the world. Many nuclear facilities are not protected against all of the plausible threats adversaries might pose—especially in the case of threats from insiders. Nuclear materials remain unnecessarily vulnerable in too many locations. The culture within many nuclear organizations is insufficiently focused on security. Many nuclear security systems are not being exposed to sufficiently in-depth, creative, and realistic vulnerability assessments and testing. This paper will summarize the post-summit evolution of nuclear security efforts and offer recommendations for regaining international nuclear security momentum through combating complacency, improving implementation on the ground, strengthening frameworks for international cooperation, and maintaining nuclear security leadership.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - The Hill
Rhetoric Aside, the US Commitment to Preventing Nuclear Terrorism is Waning
Analysis & Opinions - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The Effects of a Single Terrorist Nuclear Bomb
Journal Article - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
The future of US–Russian nuclear deterrence and arms control
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


