Journal Article - Quarterly Journal: International Security
What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and How Can We Measure It?
Abstract
In our second article, Charles Glaser of the University of Chicago and Chaim Kaufmann of Lehigh University respond to two major criticisms of offense-defense theory: first, that the theory lacks a commonly accepted definition of its key independent variable—the offense-defense balance—and, second, that the offense-defense balance cannot be measured. Glaser and Kaufmann define the balance as the “ratio of forces the attacker requires to take territory to the cost of the forces the defender has deployed.” They then explain why the critics have exaggerated how hard it is to measure this balance. While acknowledging that their approach could lead to a new round of criticism of offense-defense theory, the authors close with a strong endorsement of the theory’s overall soundness.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
International Security
For Academic Citation:
Charles L. Glaser and Chaim Kaufmann. “What Is the Offense-Defense Balance and How Can We Measure It?.” Quarterly Journal: International Security, vol. 22. no. 4. (Spring 1998): 44-82 .
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief
- Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
Abstract
In our second article, Charles Glaser of the University of Chicago and Chaim Kaufmann of Lehigh University respond to two major criticisms of offense-defense theory: first, that the theory lacks a commonly accepted definition of its key independent variable—the offense-defense balance—and, second, that the offense-defense balance cannot be measured. Glaser and Kaufmann define the balance as the “ratio of forces the attacker requires to take territory to the cost of the forces the defender has deployed.” They then explain why the critics have exaggerated how hard it is to measure this balance. While acknowledging that their approach could lead to a new round of criticism of offense-defense theory, the authors close with a strong endorsement of the theory’s overall soundness.
Want to Read More?
The full text of this publication is available via the original publication source.- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Policy Brief - Quarterly Journal: International Security
The Future of U.S. Nuclear Policy: The Case for No First Use
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy


