US-Iran relations
- President Barack Obama on CNN: “For us to undermine diplomacy at this critical time for no good reason is a mistake and that what we need to do is to finish up this round of negotiations, put the pressure on Iran to say yes to what the international community is calling for.” (CNN, 1/28)
- Nuclear Weapon Free Iran Act of 2015 (S 269)
- In a letter to Obama, Sen. Robert Menendez (D, N.J.) and other Senate Democrats agreed not to hold a floor vote on the legislation until after March 24, and only then if a political framework agreement has not been reached. (Office of Sen. Menendez, 1/27;The Hill, 1/27; Politico, 1/27; New York Times, 1/27)
- US Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken on delay: “I think it recognizes that our negotiators could use the time and space effectively of not having legislation passed before the end of March…I think the commitment to do that is something that we would see very favorably and would answer a big part of the problem that we would have with legislation, even trigger legislation, if it passed now.” (Al-Monitor, 1/27)
- Sen. Bob Corker (R, Tenn.): “The last thing we need to do is pass a bill out of the U.S. Senate that is not veto proof.” (Corker, 1/27)
- The Senate Banking Committee approved the bill with several amendments by a vote of 18-to-4, sending it to the full Senate for consideration. (Senate Banking Committee, 1/29)
- Click here for Iran Matters’ analysis of the new Kirk-Menendez legislation.
- Revised Corker-Graham-McCain (Based on S.2650 from July 2014; New draft not released)
- Boxer-Paul (Announced January 2015; No draft)
- No significant developments.
- Feinstein-Murphy Resolution
- Sens. Diane Feinstein (D, Calif.) and Chris Murphy (D, Conn.) introduced a Senate resolution supporting negotiations with Iran and affirming that, should negotiations fail or should Iran violate agreement, support for imposition of sanctions would be “strong and widespread in the Senate.” (Senate Resolution, 1/26; Reuters, 1/26)
- Feinstein: “Enacting new sanctions before the end of the negotiating period would gravely undermine our efforts to reach an agreement with Iran.” (Office of Sen. Feinstein, 1/26)
- A majority of Americans believe Obama has not been “tough enough” on Iran, according to new poll. (Fox News, 1/29)
- 70% of respondents (87% of Republicans and 57% of Democrats) believe Obama has been “not tough enough” on Iran. That sentiment has remained steady throughout his presidency (2009: 69%; 2013: 68%).
- 62% of respondents (76% of Republicans and 53% of Democrats) believe military force will be necessary to “stop Iran from working on nuclear weapons,” while 28% believe diplomacy and sanctions alone are sufficient.
- Margin of error is +/- 3%.
Geopolitics and Iran
- IRGC commander Mohammad Ali Jafari said Hizballah’s rocket attack on Israeli troops in the Golan Heights — in which two IDF soldiers were killed — was the “minimum response” to Israel’s killing of an IRGC general last month. (Al-Monitor, 1/30)
- Iran appointed Gholamali Khoshroo as its new U.N. ambassador. The US rejected Iran’s previous nominee, Hamid Abutalebi, because of his role during 1979 hostage crisis. (Reuters, 1/28; AFP, 1/28)
- Amid a broader rapprochement between Hamas and Iran, the Palestinian militant group’s leadership said Hamas will work together with Iran “for the sake of Palestine” in order to “destroy the Israeli occupation.” (Jerusalem Post, 2/1)
Israel
- Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended his decision to address Congress regarding Iran’s nuclear program, saying he is “obliged to make every effort to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons which it will aim at the State of Israel.” A White House official said Netanyahu “spat in our face” by accepting the offer to speak to Congress on March 3, which was not coordinated with the White House or State Department. (AFP, 1/25; Reuters, 1/25; Ha’aretz, 1/23)
- Netanyahu in cabinet meeting: “In the coming weeks, the major powers are liable to reach a framework agreement with Iran, an agreement that is liable to leave Iran as a nuclear threshold state, which would endanger – first and foremost – the existence of the State of Israel.” (Jerusalem Post, 1/25)
- In separate comments, he said that an agreement “leaves Iran the ability to produce the necessary material for a nuclear bomb within a few months and, afterwards, to produce dozens of nuclear bombs.” (Jerusalem Post, 1/26)
- Senior Israeli diplomat told reporters that a “crisis in talks” spawned by new sanctions could lead to collapse in negotiations and subsequent restart on better terms for the West. (Times of Israel, 1/26)
- Unnamed Israeli officials said American negotiators had agreed to “80 percent” of the Iranian position and plan to allow Iran to retain 7,000 centrifuges. No further details were provided. (Jerusalem Post, 1/30)
“Red lines,” “points of no return,” and military strikes
- No significant developments.
Uncertain or dubious claims