Discussion Paper - Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center
Carbon Tariffs Revisited
Abstract
Concerns about adverse impacts on domestic energy-intensive and trade-exposed (EITE) industries are at the fore of the political debate about unilateral climate policies. Tariffs on the carbon embodied in imported goods from countries without emission pricing appeal as a measure to reduce carbon leakage and protect domestic EITE industries. We show that the introduction of carbon tariffs can do more harm than good to domestic EITE industries. Two determinants drive the sign and magnitude of EITE impacts. Firstly, the composition of embodied emissions in goods: if a large share of embodied carbon is imported in intermediate inputs, industries might suffer from carbon tariffs. Secondly, the share of domestic output that is supplied to the export market: while carbon tariffs level the playing field on domestic markets, they increase the cost-disadvantage vis-à-vis competitors from abroad in foreign markets.
For more information on this publication:
Please contact
Harvard Project on Climate Agreements
For Academic Citation:
Böhringer, Christoph, André Müller, and Jan Schneider. “Carbon Tariffs Revisited.” Discussion Paper, 2014-64, Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, Belfer Center, March 2014.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
The United States Has Less Leverage Over Israel Than You Think
Journal Article
- International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Analysis & Opinions
- Foreign Policy
It's Not Too Late for Restrained U.S. Foreign Policy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Barham A. Salih Joins Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Middle East Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School as Senior Fellow
Analysis & Opinions
- Harvard Business Review
Intelligence Vendor Checklist
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Abstract
Concerns about adverse impacts on domestic energy-intensive and trade-exposed (EITE) industries are at the fore of the political debate about unilateral climate policies. Tariffs on the carbon embodied in imported goods from countries without emission pricing appeal as a measure to reduce carbon leakage and protect domestic EITE industries. We show that the introduction of carbon tariffs can do more harm than good to domestic EITE industries. Two determinants drive the sign and magnitude of EITE impacts. Firstly, the composition of embodied emissions in goods: if a large share of embodied carbon is imported in intermediate inputs, industries might suffer from carbon tariffs. Secondly, the share of domestic output that is supplied to the export market: while carbon tariffs level the playing field on domestic markets, they increase the cost-disadvantage vis-à-vis competitors from abroad in foreign markets.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
The United States Has Less Leverage Over Israel Than You Think
Journal Article - International Security
A “Nuclear Umbrella” for Ukraine? Precedents and Possibilities for Postwar European Security
Analysis & Opinions - Foreign Policy
It's Not Too Late for Restrained U.S. Foreign Policy
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Press Release - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Barham A. Salih Joins Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs and Middle East Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School as Senior Fellow
Analysis & Opinions - Harvard Business Review
Intelligence Vendor Checklist
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War