Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School

Comment on Trump Budget Numbers Released Thursday, March 16, 2017

| Mar. 16, 2017

If this budget or anything close to it were enacted into law, the result would be a severe setback for international relations and America's standing in the world; for clean air and water for Americans: for progress in conquering cancer, influenza, and Alzheimer's; for the fight against human-caused climate change; for U.S. leadership in science and technology; for culture and the arts; and, yes, for American business, which depends on government services far more heavily than is generally recognized.  It can only be hoped that this misguided budget will be resoundingly rejected by Congress on a bipartisan basis.

John P. Holdren, Ph.D.

Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy, Harvard Kennedy School of Government

Senior Advisor to the President, The Woods Hole Research Center

Formerly President Obama’s Science Advisor and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (January 2009 – January 2017)

Statements and views expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

For more information on this publication: Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:

Holdren, John P. "Comment on Trump Budget Numbers Released Thursday, March 16, 2017." Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, March 16, 2017

The Author

John P. Holdren

John P. Holdren

  • Teresa and John Heinz Research Professor of Environmental Policy, Harvard Kennedy School
  • Co-Director, Science, Technology and Public Policy Program
  • Member of the Board, Belfer Center
  • President Obama's Science Advisor and Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (January 2009 – January 2017)
Expertise:
Recommended
In the Spotlight
RSS
More open-sourced technology means that those who wish to use it for nefarious purposes have the same access to the technology as anyone else, write Bruce Schneier and James Waldo.
As more of society’s critical functions go digital, government must protect individuals' ability to perceive, judge, and trust or distrust things with which they interact, argues Steve Johnson.
This paper by Svenja Kirsch and Bethan Saunders proposes policy recommendations to enhance transatlantic coordination and cooperation against cyber-related threats by Russia and China.
Most Viewed

Tags