Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
The Geopolitics of Digital Currency
Introduction
The U.S. Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and Congress have begun considering the viability of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), a legal tender national digital currency for consumer use. They are understandably focused on domestic policy issues such as potential impact on U.S. financial stability or expanding public access to financial services. The national security implications of CBDCs are not yet central considerations for U.S. policymakers, but they should be.
Digitized currency is data. Digital currency will move across international borders, potentially revealing information harmful to individual, corporate, or national interests. The United States could play a critical role in fostering open and collaborative technologies that protect this data -- upholding privacy and security standards while maintaining lawful auditability in a fully digital economic world. But the United States lags other nations in its consideration of a CBDC.
China has been working toward a CBDC for almost a decade.1 It will be first among the world’s major economies to widely deploy a retail CBDC. Accordingly, China is well positioned to shape the global standards and processes governing this financial transformation. The results could transcend data privacy and security.
New global payment exchanges could undermine components of the international financial system that enhance U.S. financial power and help sustain norms of international behavior. Vulnerable components include the SWIFT2 messaging service, which facilitates the movement of money across international borders and, among other things, is fundamental to the U.S. financial sanctions regime. American leadership will be required to adapt international financial systems to CBDC technologies without compromising U.S. interests.
These considerations should inform and accelerate U.S. consideration of a CBDC and prompt greater American engagement in developing global standards and cross-border payments processes.
For more information on this publication:
Belfer Communications Office
For Academic Citation:
Sewall, Sarah and Ming Luo. “The Geopolitics of Digital Currency.” Paper, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, January 21, 2022.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
What Will Determine the Future of Money?
Blog Post
- Views on the Economy and the World
Energy Policies Can Be Both Geopolitical and Green
Analysis & Opinions
- Project Syndicate
Why China Won't Mediate an End to the Ukraine War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions
- New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Discussion Paper
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
News
- Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Graduating Belfer Student Fellows Reflect on Harvard Experience
Introduction
The U.S. Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and Congress have begun considering the viability of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), a legal tender national digital currency for consumer use. They are understandably focused on domestic policy issues such as potential impact on U.S. financial stability or expanding public access to financial services. The national security implications of CBDCs are not yet central considerations for U.S. policymakers, but they should be.
Digitized currency is data. Digital currency will move across international borders, potentially revealing information harmful to individual, corporate, or national interests. The United States could play a critical role in fostering open and collaborative technologies that protect this data -- upholding privacy and security standards while maintaining lawful auditability in a fully digital economic world. But the United States lags other nations in its consideration of a CBDC.
China has been working toward a CBDC for almost a decade.1 It will be first among the world’s major economies to widely deploy a retail CBDC. Accordingly, China is well positioned to shape the global standards and processes governing this financial transformation. The results could transcend data privacy and security.
New global payment exchanges could undermine components of the international financial system that enhance U.S. financial power and help sustain norms of international behavior. Vulnerable components include the SWIFT2 messaging service, which facilitates the movement of money across international borders and, among other things, is fundamental to the U.S. financial sanctions regime. American leadership will be required to adapt international financial systems to CBDC technologies without compromising U.S. interests.
These considerations should inform and accelerate U.S. consideration of a CBDC and prompt greater American engagement in developing global standards and cross-border payments processes.
- Recommended
- In the Spotlight
- Most Viewed
Recommended
Analysis & Opinions - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
What Will Determine the Future of Money?
Blog Post - Views on the Economy and the World
Energy Policies Can Be Both Geopolitical and Green
Analysis & Opinions - Project Syndicate
Why China Won't Mediate an End to the Ukraine War
In the Spotlight
Most Viewed
Analysis & Opinions - New Straits Times
Gorbachev and the End of the Cold War
Discussion Paper - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Why the United States Should Spread Democracy
News - Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School
Graduating Belfer Student Fellows Reflect on Harvard Experience